Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj; centurion316; Impy

Thanks for weighing in on this folks.

I did read each of your comments, in this swarm of them. If that is the ruling, then I stand corrected. Thanks again.


116 posted on 09/21/2018 9:04:38 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 $215.71 from 50% increase in 1.2183 yrs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne; centurion316; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; BillyBoy

It hasn’t happened since 1824 so you can be excused for not knowing.

In that election (4 candidates) Jackson won the most electoral votes but didn’t get a majority so it went to the House, which elected 2nd place finisher JQ Adams. Jackson and Adams both had John C Calhoun as their running mate so he did get a majority of electoral votes for VP.

The Senate had to elect the VP just once, in 1836 democrat Van Buren was elected President but some of his electors refused to vote for his running mate, Richard Johnson, who fell just short of a majority. The Senate elected Johnson over the Whig runner-up on a near party line vote.

This was talked about a little bit during the last election cause some people were hoping McMullin would carry Utah and that neither Trump nor Clinton would get 270. Democrats and enough RINOs in the House could have then possibly elected McMullin.


117 posted on 09/22/2018 1:11:27 AM PDT by Impy (I have no virtue to signal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson