To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
He probably has proof he was out of town during this alleged party..he needs to sue her sorry ass for defamation of character
To: Sarah Barracuda
He probably has proof he was out of town during this alleged party..he needs to sue her sorry ass for defamation of character Of course, if he offers the proof, she'll just say "it happened at a different party."
16 posted on
09/17/2018 12:52:12 PM PDT by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: Sarah Barracuda
To: Sarah Barracuda
He can’t prove he was out of town. She hasn’t t specified when, or which town.
He can’t dispute those things, and though the headline is deceptive, disputes that he was at any party fitting the portion of the description given.
45 posted on
09/17/2018 1:14:37 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: Sarah Barracuda
"He probably has proof he was out of town during this alleged party..he needs to sue her sorry ass for defamation of character"
No, the accusation was not specific as to time and place (how convenient!), so he cannot deny being there, whenever and wherever "there" was.
To: Sarah Barracuda
“He probably has proof he was out of town during this alleged party”
That could be difficult seeing as how she doesn’t specify a year, let alone a date
165 posted on
09/17/2018 10:24:06 PM PDT by
Figment
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson