They can burn dung for heat like any other third world (turd world?) country.
At least San Fransisco is getting a head start on building up a good supply.
Good. They can stop buying electricity from Washington state generated by the non-clean energy from hydro.
Maybe our electrical rates will go down when California stops creating demand.
“They can burn dung for heat like any other third world (turd world?) country.”
The only good side to this is it will never happen, the physics won’t work. Ditto universal healthcare and the High Speed rail.
Thorium-fueled Molten Salt reactors are the most non-polluting energy source in the world. In fact, they even burn up the residual energy found in spent uranium fuel rods, a resource we have in great plenitude, and which ARE hazardous waste.
Wind powered turbines kill a LOT of migrating birds, and solar panel arrays require considerable maintenance particularly in dusty climates. which is where many of them by necessity would have to be located, as on the middle of deserts or on a high plain with little or no rainfall.
There are, in fact no totally “clean” energy sources that do not create a number of their own problems, which may be as vexing as the energy sources being replaced. The total gasification of coal still holds at least as good an overall record in regards to total impact on the environment, as all these other schemes that rely on solar, wind or even hydroelectric power.
We know how to make coal burn clean, and to address what is in reality a non-problem, the production of carbon dioxide does NOT increase real pollution, regardless of any court ruling, as carbon dioxide is endlessly recycled in nature.
Including cow dung.