Posted on 08/28/2018 7:12:41 AM PDT by Abakumov
It wasn't until recent years that I found myself in opposition to John McCain. The once "maverick" and "hawk" was anything but. He became a bought and paid for politician that had many in his own Party, turning on him. If it wasn't enough to learn about the numerous donations from George Soros linked businesses to his campaigns, with the rise of Donald Trump, we saw a very bitter and embattled man, who lashed out in policy decisions from what appeared to be his own personal issues.
Trump did what McCain could not. Trump went on the attack - even brutally at times - and got away with it. Trump transformed the Republican Party during his run for the White House and worst of all for McCain, Trump now occupies the White House, which McCain never achieved.
(Excerpt) Read more at eagleactionreport.com ...
Nice dodge Mr Sanctimony. By your answer it appears you would rather have Hillary as President which says everything I need to know about you.
That's because she was a First Lady. He did the right thing in both instances.
There is no protocol for first ladies. And yes he did do right for McCain......after the backlash.
Why would I want someone morally as corrupt as Trump? Again, conservatives can no longer claim family values and other high moral ground issues.
But you are fine with someone as morally corrupt as Hillary. Says all you need to say.
President Trump, supposedly a woman-abuser, showed greater respect for Barbara Bush than his critics would have anticipated, since the U.S. Code doesen't even recognize the First Ladies who sacrifice so much and take so much heartache for the sake of the institution of family in these U.S. That is a deficiency in the Code, IMHO.
McCain got what he deserved according to the law as written; then the rest was political pressure from the same media that hated McCain when he ran for President. Had McCain done the right thing and retired from Congress when he learned his condition was terminal instead of his usual betrayal of his constituents and bitter and suspect manipulations, he might have fallen under the "other officials" or "principal figures" discretion of the law instead of the specific instruction for "a Member of Congress."
U.S. Code § 7 - Position and manner of display
(m)...By order of the President, the flag shall be flown at half-staff upon the death of principal figures of the United States Government and the Governor of a State, territory, or possession, as a mark of respect to their memory. ...
...In the event of the death of other officials or foreign dignitaries, the flag is to be displayed at half-staff according to Presidential instructions or orders, or in accordance with recognized customs or practices not inconsistent with law. ...
The flag shall be flown at half-staff 30 days from the death of the President or a former President; 10 days from the day of death of the Vice President, the Chief Justice or a retired Chief Justice of the United States, or the Speaker of the House of Representatives; from the day of death until interment of an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, a Secretary of an executive or military department, a former Vice President, or the Governor of a State, territory, or possession; and on the day of death and the following day for a Member of Congress.
Would conservatives be giving Hillary this kind of latitude had the death been Jim Jordan and she only gave him protocol respect?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.