FYI— the dude operates under many screen names, and fully ID’d. Networks private message-wise with others who lurk on this topic. Lot of cover names of others as well. All with zero respect and monolithic views. Deo Vindice.
I am well acquainted with the variety of hysterical fanaticism, which some of these Historical revisionists demonstrate. Edgar Alan Poe used to call out their like in the 1840s, in some of his literary reviews. Fanaticism can be very ugly.
Sounds like Democrat talk to me -- you know how Democrats talk, right?
Whatever they are most guilty of (i.e., Russian collusion) they most loudly accuse their opponents of.
Posting under many screen names sounds like something a very small number of Lost Causers would do to make it seem there's a lot more of you.
rockrr has posted here frequently since 2002, under that one screen name.
Why would rockrr want another one?
John S Mosby: "Networks private message-wise with others who lurk on this topic."
You've never used a private message?
You've never pinged someone on a topic you think interesting?
Welcome to Free Republic, newbie.
John S Mosby: "Lot of cover names of others as well."
Cover names? You mean screen names, one screen name per person, right?
You see, unlike you Lost Causers there's no need for Unionists to puff up our numbers by taking out multiple names per person, certainly not on Civil War threads.
But, tell you what, if you think you've identified multiple screen names for the same person, tell us who they are.
John S Mosby: "All with zero respect and monolithic views."
"Monolithic views"?
Well... there is a certain consistency in the truth, doncha know?
If we all stick to the truth, then we'll all sound much the same, wouldn't you expect?
As for "zero respect", what, respect for slavers?
Respect for liars?
Respect for people who started & waged war on the United States -- over slavery??
Respect for Democrats???
Why would anyone want to respect such people?
John S Mosby: "Deo Vindice."
But He didn't, did He, and we can easily imagine why.