Didn't know Bill was a "poll pirate".
Posted on 08/04/2018 10:04:11 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
Bill Mitchell:
I am one of the foremost polling experts on Twitter.
Here is the new "game" pollsters are playing. Instead of blatantly oversampling Democrats, they WILDLY over-sample Independents then claim Independents oppose Trump 2:1.
A complete lie.
Independents LOVE Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Twitter is just so much BS.
Every time I go there I am wait listed or “Twitter is taking to load. Try again later”
Idiotic communications platform
Sorry, Twitter is taking too long to load
Again...
Sessions is worthless on every front. A deep-state compromised rat bastard."
-------------
Agreed.
Clear evidence for all the folks who still wish to call Sessions something other than a traitor to Our President.
There hasn’t been a fair poll in over 40 years since the democrats learned how to manipulate them. Everyone should do themselves, and everyone else a favor and ignore polls and pollsters.
Lib pollsters say Indies go against Trump by 2-1.
Mitchell says Indies go for Trump.
Mitchell is saying that the claim that Indies go against Trump is hogwash and that it’s the new method of poll-lying.
Has he prosecuted anyone in the sanctuary cities or states for harboring illegal aliens?
**********************************************
That’s one of my big complaints against Sessions, too!
He should be directing the arrest and prosecution of those aiding, harboring and hiring illegal aliens. He should begin with some high profile folks and that will intimidate those of lower profile.
What are you using for internet a modem? lol
I never have issues with Twitter loading, but Twitter posts are definitely a big load of BS.
My guess is that Democrats are claiming to be Independents.
You were right the first time.
Sorry, I mistook the “to” to be an “a”.
Bill Mitchell was grounded, focused and accurate, something much needed during the 2016 campaign. He kept me sane during the dark days as the corrupt media tried to depress those of us opposed to the thought of a Hillary presidency. Mr. Mitchell knows his stuff. He’s a twitter must follow.
I have ignored twenty or more polls. They only call my business land line, which I reserve for business.
We, The People.
With a little help from our Russian friends. /xsarcasm
Generally, I respect Mitchell’s take on all things President Trump.
However, I don’t know how he can continue to give the worst AG in our country’s history the benefit of the doubt.
Sessions is so awful that I swear he must have voted for Crooked Hillary because he certainly has no allegiance whatsoever to the man who appointed him to his dream job.
Simple. It’s because they aren’t really independents.
FWIW, Mitchell blocked both me and Richard Baris on Twitter because we both called him out. He literally steals stuff, posts it as his own.
Last year, he had Baris (People’s Pundit Daily) on his show many times, then would run out and post exactly what Baris told him without any reference to PPD.
Well, unfortunately, it IS the breaking news platform of our day. Anything that happens anywhere in the world is immediately out on Twitter.
Rush, Hannity-—many of these guys are weeks or even months behind info that is readily available on twitter.
The pollsters are trying to get Trump supporters to stay home and not vote. They are trying to make it look like Trump’s re-election is futile, so why bother voting? Just let Kamala Harris be president in 2020.
But Trump has his base fired up. People are going to be voting for Trump in record numbers. He is going to win in a landslide. But that won’t stop the commie Rat pollsters from trying to overthrow him.
Didn't know Bill was a "poll pirate".
Why polls are so often wrong:
When pollsters call and get no answer, or a hangup, they just move on. Instead, and for statistical accuracy, they MUST treat these calls as part of the sample with the replies as “unknown”. This would of course force them to use MUCH larger samples to obtain the same margin of error (statistical confidence). But they just skip them as if they hadn’t occurred.
If they included the actual sample size, and counted the hangups / no answers among the sample, their margins of error would be more like +/- 10% instead of +/- 3%
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.