Posted on 07/12/2018 11:41:47 AM PDT by deplorableindc
FBI official Peter Strzok testified Thursday that he can't recall using his work computer to soften the wording of a statement exonerating Hillary Clinton of mishandling classified information.
Strzok conceded during a joint hearing of the House Oversight and Judiciary committees that metadata indicates his computer made the change, but said he can't remember doing it.
The June 2016 edit changed "grossly negligent," a term that carries legal liability under the Espionage Act, to "extremely careless."
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
One question:
How long did it take you to get so ugly, evil and devious? In rounded off years.
Months late by what event calendar? Yours, or his private one?
to the Hill
Incomprehensible by what brain? Yours or his?
by the discovery of the facts of his bias. Why are you asking such idiotic questions? Where have you been the last 18 months.
And dems find that acceptable, to show up unprepared or without documents or notes?
To me this just confirms how poorly Strozk views his work past and present and disregard for government time, he is a huge waste on numerous levels as are all those “gentlemen and women” constantly butting in and talking out of turn. They have no respect or regard for the USofA and it's legal citizens - they are just all selfish self serving lemmings following the twisted corrupted views of “I think it so it's got to be right” en-grained intheir minds.
Strzok sure uses his white lined pad to notate so he can try to get zingers in when given moments to comment/respond as he wishes at times. Its unsettling how he thinks he has done no wrong.
you have to ask yourself why you think his inaction leading us deeper and deeper into the swamp its ok with you?
Why are you asking such twisted and devious counter-questions? It is glaringly clear that Donald believes that letting the dead skunk in the middle of the road stink, is going to get an advantage in the future.
Who’s going to lie down here? Congress won’t. Trump won’t.
One can go deep into the swamp to plant an explosive charge that will move more swamp.
he denied knowing what was in texts as rowdy pointed out. It didn’t need him to review docs as he claimed. There is enough in his own words to indict him for not going to his boss and recusing himself.
It is difficult to talk to someone who denies what is clearly in front of them.
It is difficult to talk to someone who doesn’t understand Sun Tzu.
If courts or juries believed testimony like his, the prisons would be empty.
Trump knows jolly well, this is a Gulliver in Lilliput occasion, except Gulliver can break the cords at the time of his choosing. Why not do it with all Lilliput on him?
It’s now 2:47pm. What a waste of oxygen Strzok and the Dems on the committees are!
BTW, just for poops and giggles, I can describe the exact moment that I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that Bill Clinton would never have any legacy at all, at least not like he wanted, and that the press wouldn’t bend over backwards to try to fabricate one for him.
Turn back the dial with me to a long lost time when Billy was giving one of his SOTU addresses. As it happens the event I’m to recount occurred on Fox ... not Fox News as that didn’t exist back then. The channel was on Fox because that was the channel Tiny Toons had been on earlier in the day. Now, after the reveal I will demonstrate that it wasn’t just a Fox thing, it’s just that it happened in an especially memorable way ON Fox that night.
He’d been speaking for a while, as he was wont to do, and you could see him eyeing this small pitcher of cool water and a glass set before him.
At a long applause pause he poured himself some water and was taking a drink, a totally innocent thing to do after having been talking for a while.
THAT was when it happened!
The Fox commentator broke in and in one of those golf whispers that they use to act like if they spoke any louder they’d disrupt the doings and said:
“President William Jefferson Clinton giving his State of the Union Address, STILL unaware of the O.J.Simpson verdict!”
I shouted “He cares!?!” at the TV, and I’m faaaaar from being a Clinton supporter.
The next day we had fair number of high caliber supposedly serious “journalist” and commentators lamenting that we’d had to hear about O.J. from Geraldo, who is not a real journalist.
These people were itching to turn away from the speech to O.J. but felt constrained to stay.
And by in large they were the very ones who’d been carrying Clinton’s water.
That very day I knew he’d never recover and the closet thing he’d ever have to his legacy was losing the House.
We don’t need explosives, we need Sugar Free Haribo Bears...
would be great to hear that stated and if some msm or otherwise it’s circulated widely. expose more of Mueller baloney waste of time and money.
Just like dems making the whole questioning take longer by their constant interuptions and also when it’s their turn to ask questions they spend many minutes talkign about all sorts of other issues before they even get to a valid question.
I was talking of various times not just Gowdy’s questioning, but I’m saddened to see what a mess the dems turn it into and even such a waste of time.
I wish we could have had Lisa in stocks out in front of the capitol for her stunt of saying she she couldn’t show up yeaterday for bogus reasons. These employees of the govt think they are above the law or can stretch it to fit their wants - just like average thug evil criminals.
Then ask him whom he thinks changed it. Comey? Lisa? The list can’t be very long.
I’m so tired of seeing these people wiggle out of consequences.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.