Oh she even has three names.
How quaint.
At least it’s not Beauregard. In all seriousness I really do believe that Cruz would be the most likely to ‘evolve.’ One possible out would be an upper age limit to serve, like 70-75. No dementia. No sudden drama. Will the drama go down when the left realizes it doesn’t buy them anything?
That may be something of a media creation. She’s listed as “Amy C. Barrett” on the Seventh Circuit website.
“Oh she even has three names.
How quaint.”
Yes, it’s “obligatory” to have a middle name when you’re “important!” It’s a little more forgivable when you are a married woman who may well have had a professional career before marriage. But mostly it’s personal self-agrandizement.
actually many people have three names.
It means the person can't make up their mind about who they are.
Do you want them making decisions on the SC that could affect all of our lives for decades?
Just my opinion....
Hard to imagine why an ostensible conservative (such as thyself) on a conservative web site (such as this one) would snark at a married Christian woman using her maiden name and her husband’s name—without a hyohen—in the traditional manner. Is “quaint” some kind of a compliment, in your mind? You’d prefer a feminist who wouldn’t use her husband’s name?