I’m an Evangelical and she is not my dream pick.
______________________________________________
Sounds like a CATHOLIC dream pick to me.
I’m Catholic, and I definitely don’t trust someone who is defined solely as “Catholic.” Pope Francis is Catholic, and there are many Catholics who think like him.
We need someone who puts the exact words of the Constitution first.
Laura definitely doesn’t speak for me, in fact, I’d worry about her choices.
Laura’s an east coast, Dartmouth grad, served as a clerk on Supremes, meaning to me, she speaks for “centrist/conservatives” who’ve never stepped a foot outside their established bubble.
Laura thinks she speaks for the “common man/woman” but who among us went to Dartmouth, got law degrees and clerked for the Supremes!
If we got degrees, they were from state colleges and universities and maybe got master’s going nights and summers, while raising our families and paying taxes, supporting local little leagues, all without being noticed by anyone, outside our own families.
“Sounds like a CATHOLIC dream pick to me.”
So, if she were Lutheran, you’d obviously write:
Sounds like a LUTHERAN dream pick to me.
If she were Methodist, you’d write:
Sounds like a METHODIST dream pick to me.
If she were Anglican, you’d write:
Sounds like a ANGLICAN dream pick to me.
If she were Jewish:
Sounds like a JEWISH dream pick to me.
And, if she were Mormon:
Sounds like a MORMON dream pick to me.
Hmm. Smells like BIGOTRY to me.
If there are 25 outstanding candidates, let’s balance things a bit a pick a conservative evangelical Protestant for a change. How many evangelicals are actually on the Court? I think ZERO.
I would love to see Judge Roy Moore there!