Skip to comments.
Audio reveals DNC committee reaction to Kennedy retirement: 'This is not good news'
The Hill ^
| 06/27/18
| Avery Anapol
Posted on 06/27/2018 12:56:15 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
Audio taken during a Democratic National Committee (DNC) Rules Committee conference call reveals the immediate reaction to the news Wednesday of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedys retirement.
In the audio clip shared on Twitter by Politico reporter David Siders, Democrats on the call express disappointment that Kennedy, a moderate conservative justice known for often being a swing vote, would be retiring.
After one participant reads the news aloud, cries of oh, and oh my god can be heard. The audio was taken during a public conference call on superdelegate reform.
This is not good news, one person says.
Another attendee points to Kennedys status as the courts swing vote, but pointed out that he sided with the conservative majority in several recent rulings, including the decision to uphold President Trumps travel ban.
Not that hes done us any good on these recent decisions, but he was the one that was usually persuadable, the attendee says in the clip.
Kennedys departure opens the door for Trump to make his second Supreme Court nomination. Democrats have already expressed concern that whoever Trump appoints will swing the court farther to the right, and clear a path for anti-abortion advocates and other conservative movements to bring more cases.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: dnc; goodnews; kennedyretiring; supremecourt; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Audio at link.
To: yesthatjallen
2
posted on
06/27/2018 12:58:10 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
To: yesthatjallen
were they crying in the audio? I dont like listening to leftards...
To: beergarden
were they crying in the audio?
****************
Caterwauling. LOL
4
posted on
06/27/2018 1:01:26 PM PDT
by
Starboard
To: yesthatjallen
Gonna be some heavy drinking at the bars tonight.
To: yesthatjallen
Liberals think this means the end if their country.
Let’s help them leave so they can go make a better life for themselves in some other country.
6
posted on
06/27/2018 1:04:09 PM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: yesthatjallen
To: yesthatjallen
8
posted on
06/27/2018 1:04:40 PM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Deplorable Charter Member of The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy - and DAMN Proud of it!.)
To: BBQToadRibs
I doubt they will wait until they get to the bar.
To: yesthatjallen
At this critical moment in America's history, Justice Kennedy may have made the most positively wise and beneficial-to-liberty decision of his long career on the bench.
The Constitutional Structure For Limited And Balanced Government
The Constitution was devised with an ingenious and intricate built-in system of checks and balances to guard the people's liberty against combinations of government power. It structured the Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary separate and wholly independent as to function, but coordinated for proper operation, with safeguards to prevent usurpation of power. Only by balancing each against the other two could freedom be preserved, said John Adams. Another writer of the day summarized clearly the reasons for such checks and balances:
- "If the LEGISLATIVE and JUDICIAL powers are united, the MAKER of the law will also INTERPRET it (constitutionality).
- Should the EXECUTIVE and LEGISLATIVE powers be united... the EXECUTIVE power would make itself absolute, and the government end in tyranny.
- Should the EXECUTIVE and JUDICIAL powers be united, the subject (citizen) would then have no permanent security of his person or property."
"INDEED, the dependence of any of these powers upon either of the others ... has so often been productive of such calamities... that the page of history seems to be one continued tale of human wretchedness." (Theophilus Parsons, ESSEX RESULTS)
What were some of these checks and balances believed so important to individual liberty? Several are listed below:
- HOUSE (peoples representatives) is a check on SENATE - no statute becomes law without its approval.
- SENATE is a check on HOUSE - no statute becomes law without its approval. (Prior to 17th Amendment, SENATE was appointed by State legislatures as a protection for states' rights - another check the Founders provided.)
- EXECUTIVE (President) can restrain both HOUSE and SENATE by using Veto Power.
- LEGISLATIVE (Congress - Senate & House) has a check on EXECUTIVE by being able to pass, with 2/3 majority, a bill over President's veto.
- LEGISLATIVE has a further check on EXECUTIVE through power of discrimination in appropriation of funds for operation of EXECUTIVE.
- EXECUTIVE (President) must have approval of SENATE in filling important posts in EXECUTIVE BRANCH.
- EXECUTIVE (President) must have approval of SENATE before treaties with foreign nations can be effective.
- LEGISLATIVE (Congress) can conduct investigations of EXECUTIVE to see if funds are properly expended and laws enforced.
- EXECUTIVE has a further check on members of LEGISLATIVE (Congress) in using discretionary powers in decisions regarding establishment of military bases, building & improvement of navigable rivers, dams, interstate highways, etc., in districts of those members.
- JUDICIARY is a check on LEGISLATIVE through its authority to review all laws and determine their constitutionality.
- LEGISLATIVE (Congress) has restraining power over JUDICIARY, with constitutional authority to restrict extent of its jurisdiction.
- LEGISLATIVE has power to impeach members of JUDICIARY guilty of treason, high crimes, or misdemeanors.
- EXECUTIVE (President) is a check on JUDICIARY by having power to nominate new judges.
- LEGISLATIVE (Senate) is a check on EXECUTIVE and JUDICIARY having power to approve/disapprove nominations of judges.
- LEGISLATIVE is a check on JUDICIARY - having control of appropriations for operation of federal court system.
- LEGISLATIVE (Peoples Representatives) is a check on both EXECUTIVE and JUDICIARY through power to initiate amendments to Constitution subject to approval by 3/4 of the States.
- LEGISLATIVE (Senate) has power to impeach EXECUTIVE (President) with concurrence of 2/3, of members.
- The PEOPLE, through their State representatives, may restrain the power of the federal LEGISLATURE if 3/4 of the States do not ratify proposed Constitutional Amendments.
- LEGISLATIVE, by Joint Resolution, can terminate certain powers granted to EXECUTIVE (President) (such as war powers) without his consent.
- It is the PEOPLE who have the final check on both LEGISLATIVE and EXECUTIVE when they vote on their Representatives every 2 years, their Senators every 6 years, and their President every 4 years. Through those selections, they also influence the potential makeup of the JUDICIARY.
It is up to each generation to see that the integrity of the Constitutional structure for a free society is maintained by carefully preserving the system of checks and balances essential to limited and balanced government.
"To preserve them (is) as necessary as to institute them," said George Washington.
Footnote: Our Ageless Constitution, W. David Stedman & La Vaughn G. Lewis, Editors (Asheboro, NC, W. David Stedman Associates, 1987) Part III: ISBN 0-937047-01-5
To: yesthatjallen
Is it rude if I point out that getting 50 votes in the senate is not going to be easy?
To: shelterguy
I see a lot of crying into Cosmo’s and Bourbon apple sangria. (With a Persian lime twist.)
To: babble-on
There are a number of dem senators in Red states that need to go along or get the boot.
To: yesthatjallen
14
posted on
06/27/2018 1:10:05 PM PDT
by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: babble-on
No it’s not rude. There are some soft Republicans, plus the GOP is apparently down 1 permanently because John McCain may never return to vote on anything.
But let’s hope some Dems such as Manchin of West Virginia or Heidkamp of North Dakota vote to confirm a conservative nominee.
To: babble-on
Not to me.
Many people are counting chickens that haven't hatched.
This isn't the end. It's the beginning of the beginning.
To: yesthatjallen
Kennedy was supposed to be a conservative judge. Once on the court, he swung far left.
17
posted on
06/27/2018 1:12:38 PM PDT
by
Fido969
(In!)
To: yesthatjallen
Now if only Breyer and Ginsburg would retire. Then we could get the court to 7-to-2.
18
posted on
06/27/2018 1:13:15 PM PDT
by
Optimus Prime
(Do liberals even qualify as sentient beings?)
To: yesthatjallen
After one participant reads the news aloud, cries of oh, and oh my god can be heard. The audio was taken during a public conference call on superdelegate reform. This is not good news, one person says. For them. It's good news for the country. It's good news for the world. It's good news for the government. It's good news for the people.
To: yesthatjallen
Geez. Wait until these yahoos hear that RBG finally dies. Only dogs will be able to hear the keening.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson