Posted on 06/24/2018 5:48:39 AM PDT by Kaslin
Unless you have been hiding on a South Seas island, you have become quite aware of the Justice Department Inspector General’s (IG) report released regarding the Clinton Investigation plus more. There are so many points here, but let’s focus on the most important ones:
1. This has nothing to do with the everyday men and women of the FBI. FBI Director Christopher Wray should stop hiding behind them like his mother’s skirt. This is all about the leadership of the FBI – the seventh floor of the building.
2. There was a culture created and protected that allowed a definitive bias to exist during the 2016 election and beyond in that group. That is on Comey’s head and there is no evidence Wray has obliterated that culture.
3. The fact that Peter Strzok and Lisa Page exchanged so many damning text messages on their FBI devices is evidence of that culture. We, in private industry, learned long ago that all of our emails/texts are subject to review at a further time. Strzok and Page most likely knew that because they had seen it used against FBI suspects. They went ahead with their communications anyway. There is only one rationale for their behavior. They thought they would never be looked at. They thought they were above the law because they thought they were the law.
4. Now that all the leadership has been alerted to the fact that they should not communicate their deeply-prejudicial political views on FBI devices should not mean they are just transferred to private devices. Wray’s comment that he will initiate bias training will not alleviate the bias any more than Howard Schultz shutting down Starbucks for racial bias training will alleviate racial bias.
5. The fact that FBI agents were being hosted by members of the media for golf outings and meals staggers the imagination. The vast majority of them did not even have authorization to communicate with the press.
6. There are a lot of reasons to question the wisdom and leadership of James Comey. But we now have one that is irrefutable. This man did not know that Huma Abedin was married to Anthony Weiner. How out of touch can one person be? I could go on with snarky remarks amplifying this astonishing fact, but all one has to say is: REALLY?
7. Why was Comey involved in the Clinton decision anyway? When AG Lynch had her meeting with former President Clinton and then lied to the public that the discussion was about grandchildren, she finally had to fess up and step aside. Why did her number
two not take over like when AG Sessions stepped aside? No one seems to have asked that. Why did it fall to Comey to make the decision whether to indict Clinton?
8. Some of the texts in the report were ones that were sent to Congress with incremental parts redacted. That means there is an active cabal within the FBI to hide information from us and our elected officials responsible for their oversight. That means Wray is not doing the job. That means Wray should be fired. The New FBI Director/acting FBI Director should immediately release all information unredacted to Congress and stop hiding behind the lie of “national security.”
9. Why did it take a congressman to provide the names of lawyer #2 and #5? Why did the IG hold back these names that sent inflammatory texts? The FBI stated they were working in counterintelligence when they were not. Why do they continue to treat us and our elected officials like children? Another reason the seventh floor needs to be swept clean.
10. The fact that the IG did not find direct bias in the decisions of the FBI is different from the fact that there was no bias. A blind man could see there was bias – extreme bias. The fact that the IG did not see it in the decisions is his own interpretation. Let’s not believe that despite the fine job the IG did he did not have an institutional bias to preserve the integrity of the FBI and Justice Department.
11. It is almost impossible to believe that people like Strozk and Page and others who harbored great animus toward Trump did not allow any of that animus to invade their work on the Clinton or Trump investigations. It defies almost any experience I have had in my life. It is possible, but the chances are the same for me flying to Mars.
12. Here is something to think about: The IG stated they could find no bias in the decisions made. Yet we discover through the report that Comey either inappropriately or illegally had used a private email address to perform FBI business. Thus, he was guilty of doing the same improper behavior Ms. Clinton was excused of in the investigation. Is it not possible that Comey knew if he endorsed indictment of Clinton his own malfeasance would come out and thus that drove his decision? Isn’t that bias?
13. As an aside, this report brought out that President Obama lied. And I thought Trump was the only president who lied. The report validated that Obama lied about when he knew that Clinton had a private server. But this should have been known two years ago if we had a functional press at the time. Obama had to be getting emails from her private email address as opposed to Hillary@secretaryofstate.gov. Didn’t he see that and say to himself “Why is Hil sending me an email from a private email address?” He neither said anything about it nor put a stop to it. He just lied about it when asked.
Of the tens of thousands of words I have read about this report, these words from the editors of the Investor’s Business Daily are my favorites: “But look at the report in its totality and you see that time and again officials made ‘judgment calls’ that weakened their investigation. In other words, from the range of options available to them, they consistently chose the less aggressive course of action.”
Here is another thought from the best source for analysis of these matters, Andy McCarthy;
“It has become a refrain among defenders of the FBI and Justice Department that critics are trying to destroy these vital institutions. In point of fact, these agencies are doing yeoman’s work destroying themselves — much to the chagrin of those of us who spent much of our professional lives proudly carrying out their mission.”
Don’t take the IG’s statement that he found no bias as it has been twisted by some. He found nothing that said “I am tanking this investigation to make sure Clinton wins and Trump loses.” This report clearly displays the FBI was out of control. It is still out of control evidenced by their belligerent attitude toward delivering subpoenaed information to our elected officials.
This organization needs a gutting at the top.
“1. This has nothing to do with the everyday men and women of the FBI.”
I also disagree.
If there were pro-Conservative or pro-Trump people at the FBI sending text messages to each other about ‘effing Hillary’, those texts would have been leaked to the leftist media.
Like most government organizations, the FBI and DOJ are dominated by Leftist Democrats.
The FBI needs to be disbanded.
It is hopelessly corrupt.
“1. This has nothing to do with the everyday men and women of the FBI”
The more I hear that, the less I believe it.
“Plenty of Stuka pilots and Panzer drivers are great guys: only their ORDERS are bad. Do you really want to kill GOOD men just like YOU..?”
How does that sound..?
““1. This has nothing to do with the everyday men and women of the FBI.”
Disagree. This is so wide spread, that if there were any integrity left at the FBI; there would be thousands of agents coming forward to testify.”
I see it said a lot that the rank and file FBI is embarrassed and extremely offended by the corrupt and illegal behavior of their top tier management. I disagree with that assumption as well. Let me say that I’m skeptical. It’s actually a common affliction for members of such elite organizations to develop their first alliegence and loyalty to be to their organization. You’ll find it in the ATF, DEA, CIA, IRS, etc. that why strong and vigorous oversight with stringent consequences for not just illegalities but also any mischief is an absolute must.
It’s actually a common affliction for members of such elite organizations to develop their first alliegence and loyalty to be to their organization. You’ll find it in the ATF, DEA, CIA, IRS, etc.
*****************
Absolutely true. Their job security, career advancement, and even friendships with colleagues become part of the loyalty equation. They become “wedded” to their agencies.
Its also true with respect to other agencies, most of which are predominately staffed by Democrats. Dependence on ever expanding government programs breeds even more loyalty to progressive politics.
And Comey claims he never met or spoke to Hellary...
“Where are all the protests against fumdament as list militancy by moderate Muslims..?”
Great question.
And we should be asking where are all these thousands of shining, outraged, good FBI people.
CRICKETS.
“It is still out of control evidenced by their belligerent attitude toward delivering subpoenaed information to our elected officials.”
Sessions puts in benign cameo appearances from time to time.
“It’s actually a common affliction for members of such elite organizations to develop their first alliegence and loyalty to be to their organization. “
Exactly. It’s like omerta..code of silence for mafia. Practiced by all police from state/local up through the federal agencies. Very, very powerful. If there was any honor among the rank and file there would have been tons of leaks but....crickets.
“I love Trump and Melania but boy oh boy did he F up on Sessions and Wray.”
Did he ever. I would think that with all his worldly experience in dealing with the business world’s scum of the earth he would have been pretty damn shrewd in taking the measure of a man. He missed with Sessions and Wray.
#7 Lynch stated she went to WH ethics group after Clinton tarmac meeting and they told her she didn’t have to recuse herself.
But Sessions was told he had to recuse by the DOJ ethics folks.
Then later Sessions said he was given wrong legal advice and didn’t have to recuse and yet he refuses to un-recuse himself.
THE FBI needs to be turned on its shoulders, after the head is removed.
Waist?
I was just trying to help folks understand a little nuance in the word intent as used to prove violations of statutes.
The agents and prosecutors that prepare the affidavits to present to judges seeking warrants to arrest and/or search must get probable cause and intent into their narratives.
A trick I learned was to think - Scienter defined as Guilty knowledge that is sufficient to charge a person with the consequences of his or her acts. ... The term often is used interchangeably with Mens Rea, which describes criminal intent, but scienter has a broader application because it also describes knowledge required to assign liability in many civil cases.
What little I know shows me that HRC met the elements of scienter when she asked that headers be stripped from classified documents and had them sent via unsecure email. Former Director Comey proved to a lot of us that he was ignorant of the basics of putting a prosecutable case together when he tried to convince a nation that HRC deserved a pass. Her actions reeked of Guilty Knowledge and any prosecutor worth his salt would have had no trouble selling a jury on that fact.
Instead, the facts show that Comey and others had a bias that HRC was destined to be president and we all need to look aside and let her pass. That is bias.
No, the head of the institution must be decapitated, then the carcass must be drawn and quartered, with its parts sent to the largest urban leftist enclaves.
All future LEO functions required by Federalism can be handled by U. S. Marshals.
For any lurking leftists: The previous post was metaphorical.
At best, that is why Sessions betrays his Oath.
He is in the SES.
we’re back ping!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.