Posted on 06/17/2018 8:12:01 AM PDT by bitt
In the war over documents between the House and Senate committees investigating the FBI and other intelligence abuses and the FBI/Department of Justice, you might wonder why Congress keeps whining. After all, they say We asked for these documents a year ago and still dont have them! Why werent these sections included in what we requested? And so on.
You have probably heard that Congress has oversight powers over these executive departments and agencies. In a sense thats true, although there was no Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1789. Indeed, there is no Department of Justice mentioned in the Constitution (and it didnt appear until 1870interestingly, recent scholarship suggests, not so much as to handle all the leftover Civil War cases but to streamline and reduce the size of government). The first Attorney General, Edmund Randolph, took office in September 1789 after Congress passed the Judiciary Act of 1789 that created the Office of the Attorney General. It is tenuously through that Act that Congress maintains any control at all over the AGs office, the staff of which is appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the U.S. Senate.
(Excerpt) Read more at bigleaguepolitics.com ...
You probably have not. It is likely with the higher agencies first where I am.
Trump does have a slight resemblance to a Cheshire Cat.
“Higher agencies” you located on a hill or something?
He’s got a strategy I believe.
Trump has to assess the proper timing.
******************
Timing is favorable right now. He has a reservoir of political capital coming off the heels of the NK Summit and the strong U.S. economic performance since his election.
There are other positives as well, but the beneficial wind behind his back right now is that the DOJ and FBI have been exposed through congressional investigations and the release of the IG findings that he can highlight. The timing is good for cleaning out those rogue agencies.
People are well aware of the corruption within the executive branch and rightly expect the president to do something about it. You may disagree but bad things have a way of getting worse if left unchecked. Nobody stopped Obama and we came perilously close to seeing our country turned into a police state.
I don’t think the timing for Trump could be much better than it is now. He has the Bully Bulpit and should go before the American people and make the case for cleaning house. It would also be consistent with his oft repeated promise to Drain the Swamp. Its what he was elected to do.
If they can pass that, then they could also pass legislation abolishing civil service protection for DOJ and FBI employees, and give the president the authority to fire any or all of them.
Then Trump could just perform a decimation. “All employees whose social security number ends in 5 are hereby terminated”.
“He has the Bully Bulpit and should go before the American people and make the case for cleaning house”.
I’ve thought for a long time that he will do exactly that.
Your post is very good.
That is good news, and supports the implications of Gowdy's remark, "We will use the full force of the Constitution..."
Congress has the power ... (Clause 15:) To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
Unfortunately there is Already PRECEDENCE for the Sergeant at Arms to ARREST ANYONE ANYWHERE, see Hinds Precedents.....
Please see “US vs Nixon (1974)”.
This was a 9 - 0 SCOTUS decision during Pres. Nixon’s impeachment on the Watergate tapes.
There is no executive branch privilege of any sort from a Congressional Impeachment investigation.
Not “classification.”
Not “Sources and Methods”.
Not “Presidential Executive Privilege.”
Not Attorney-client Privilege between Federal executive branch lawyers and the President.
It is all on the table.
Only the paid personal lawyers to the President are not covered by “US vs Nixon (1974)”.
If Asst AG Rosenstein is impeached, the House gets every single document it requested with no redaction’s.
Impeachment is the thermonuclear weapon of the Constitution for the Congress to use against either or both the Executive or Judicial Branches.
Does the House have the nerve to impeach RR? Plus the GOP may lose some House seats in the midterms.
How many electoral votes did RR win, again?
Ditto!
“Money talks, BS walks.”
Not sure I understand your point. The House can impeach executive branch office holders other than the POTUS.
Trump potentially could start firing them for not complying - time to clear out all the obama appointees and anyone THEY appointed.
You drain a swamp with a bulldozer, not a shovel.
I've said this many, many times, but Trump holds all the cards. I happen to believe he is 100% in charge of what is unfolding, and is allowing events to take place at his leisure. I know others like EG hold a more alarming opinion, but my confidence is based on my expectation of military support.
I think Trump is allowing the judicial process to play itself out fully to whatever extent is possible with that corrupt branch. If it ultimately produces the desires results, then Trump/we will have won taking the easy path. But the hard way is still left in reserve. Lincoln had the 'nads to take the nation to war. The huge question is does Trump? I think he does.
It simply makes no logical sense to me why anyone would have gone through all this tremendous time and effort to simply throw up their hands when victory is so close and say "no mas". If calling out the militia and/or military to defend the nation against real and present existential dangers is the only remaining course of action to achieve MAGA, then I assume Trump will be able to do what is necessary.
Good luck trying to arrest RR.
and since the boss won’t fire them they keep getting away with it
FREEPmail.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.