This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 06/09/2018 1:19:09 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 06/08/2018 6:41:43 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
From the indictment [Note Male-1 is Carter Page]:
Reporter #1 is likely Manu Raju of CNN. Reporter #2 is definitely Ali Watkins of New York Times. Reporter #3 is likely Marianna Sotomayor of NBC Reporter #4 is likely Brian Ross of ABC
Accepting there has been a great deal of work on the leak investigation; and accepting the purpose therein; the Wolfe indictment appears strategic in that it captures four of the largest media outlets within the net. Four mainstream media enterprises are now on notice. With more than six months of investigation, and with the timing of the indictment becoming public, its likely the FBI leak task-force caught more than just Wolfe.
Wolfe is simply the first to be identified. Suspicion: Wolfe will likely lead to Dan Jones.
On December 15th, with the evidence and admissions therein; and specifically noting the FBI showed Mr. Wolfe photographic evidence (he was also under physical surveillance); James Wolfe opened the door to an investigative path that was almost certainly followed. In essence, anyone in contact with Wolfe would now be inside the investigative review.
This is important because Wolfe wasnt arrested until six months after he was clearly busted. Within this time-frame other people would be under investigation.
The FBI would be able to use the information gathered from Wolfe, and exploit his compromise, for search and surveillance warrants on other participants within his contact circle. The investigators would not want the downstream participants to know.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
And some are unaware that Sessions made his recusal intentions clear during his confirmation hearings and want to pretend Trump wasnt paying attention.
Trump pays attention to everything.
Ah, the old fall back of calling Trump a liar. It was just a matter of time.
How is it possible for the Senate to speak on a position that has no nominee? If Sessions is fired or resigns President will nominate a replacement. Then the Senate can do its thing whatever that might be. Nothing is cut in stone. Until the Senate confirms or denies a replacement, there would be an ‘acting’ Attorney General.
Is what it is. Only those in fantasy land cant see that.
‘How is it possible for the Senate to speak on a position that has no nominee?’
If you’d been paying attention you’d already know the answer to this question.
Trump:
Sessions should have never recused himself and if he was going to recuse himself he should have told me before he took the job and I would have picked somebody else.
Trump knew.
Jeff Sessions is refusing to do his job(Hes actually protecting the corrupt state) and refusing to step down. Let that sink in...
And trump is refusing to fire him. Let that sink in.
With the demoncrats a lock for impeachment and 90 percent of your ‘own’ party just waiting for an excuse, it’s not surprising Trump has been reluctant to drop the hammer on that POS keebler elf and his cabal of obama stooges
Your ‘Trump is a liar,’ routine is just repugnant. Isn’t Maxine Waters the big, ‘Trump is a liar,’ megaphone? Do we have to wade through her hateful screed here, too?
Is what it is. Only those in fantasy land cant see that.
The only fantasy here is you thinking POTUS could have plausibly withdrawn Sessions appointment in the middle of his confirmation process due to his offer of recusal. Had Trump done that it would have been the biggest firestorm in DC since Watergate. Guaranteed.
Grab some popcorn.
Trump has a higher level of risk letting this continue than if he ended the farces right now. He has to inflate his balls a little more and then let McConnell show what a puss he really us. He now has a majority the country on his side and the fraud is obvious to most..
When you let someone tell you not to fire an incompetent in a very important position, you are surrendering your power and responsibility.
Well no one can say that Nixon let anybody tell him who he couldn’t fire.
That’s correct. But trump is not nixon, he is the victim not the perp and the majority now believes the investigation is a coup and a farce.
No one believed that about nixon, except a few hardliners here...
I actually agree with you. I would rather have NO ONE in the DOJ than the current staff of obama stooges and backstabbers.
It’s a gamble either way. If it were me, I would’ve fired sessions/rosenstein/mueller last year. But that’s easy for me to say...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.