Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WONDERING, WONDERING, WONDERING
The Washington Times ^ | May 29, 2018 | Jennifer Harper

Posted on 05/29/2018 10:01:12 PM PDT by TBP

They are still paying attention. The majority of voters — 51 percent — now are convinced that “high-level federal law enforcement officials tried illegally to stop Donald Trump from being president,” according to a new Rasmussen Reports survey.

It also found that GOP voters appear particularly suspicious: 72 percent of likely Republican voters agree with the aforementioned statement, up from 66 percent in a similar survey conducted in February, the pollster says.

Even Trump critics are beginning to wonder. The survey found that 29 percent of Democrats say officials broke the law in order to stop Mr. Trump’s win, up from 22 percent in the prior poll.

The survey of 1,000 likely voters was conducted May 22-23.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; carterpage; election; election2018; election2020; fbi; georgepapadopoulos; russia; samclovis; stefanhalper; trump
It's the second item in the column. Scroll down. Very good poll.
1 posted on 05/29/2018 10:01:12 PM PDT by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBP

I wonder if 51% will ever realize that Obama was never eligible?


2 posted on 05/29/2018 10:04:48 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Wow. 29 percent of democrats? I didn’t know that many democrats weren’t drinking the MS13NBC Kool-Aid.


3 posted on 05/29/2018 10:05:00 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Nah, nah, Trey Doody says it’s all good, yo.


4 posted on 05/29/2018 10:11:28 PM PDT by chris37 ("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Not unless SOMEONE explains the real reason why!
Bets, anyone?
“To Tell The Truth”


5 posted on 05/29/2018 10:57:09 PM PDT by V K Lee (Anyone who thinks my story is anywhere near over is sadly mistaken. - US Pres. Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The Clinton forces proved during Bubba’s reign that they’d stop at nothing to get and hold power. This Trump fiasco being staged by Mueller, a Hilary stooge, shows just how far the forces of Leftism will go.


6 posted on 05/30/2018 2:42:20 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP
The majority of voters — 51 percent — now are convinced that “high-level federal law enforcement officials tried illegally to stop Donald Trump from being president,” according to a new Rasmussen Reports survey.

They're close. The correct statement?

High-level federal law enforcement officials are still trying illegally to stop Donald Trump from being president.

In short: conspiracy, treason, and sedition - a coup.

7 posted on 05/30/2018 3:19:29 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Executive branch TRAITORS of the previous administration. Execute the executive SCUM.


8 posted on 05/30/2018 3:45:45 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Trey Gowdy just asked: “What did Russia do?”

Considering how he loyally supports Mueller, that question exposes just how corrupt he and the whole investigation is. The question speaks volumes of what is wrong with this whole mess.

The foundation of that question is: I know the Russians did something. Therefore, that “something” has to be obvious in order for there to be an investigation.

That SOMETHING in the minds of these corrupt people is none other than the fact that Trump won.

Throughout this lengthy investigation, the one thing that cannot be demonstrated is the point of contact of Russian intervention that won the election for Trump. What was the spear point that hit the target? What was the stroke of sheer genius that enabled the Russians to accomplish an unheard feat: to completely control the outcome of an American presidential election, to neutralize the hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the democrats and defeat the accumulated wisdom of democrat campaign operatives? That is a question that is carefully avoided by the promoters of the investigation.


9 posted on 05/30/2018 5:03:19 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg
"Throughout this lengthy investigation, the one thing that cannot be demonstrated is the point of contact of Russian intervention that won the election for Trump.

What was the spear point that hit the target?

What was the stroke of sheer genius that enabled the Russians to accomplish an unheard feat: to completely control the outcome of an American presidential election, to neutralize the hundreds of millions of dollars spent by the democrats and defeat the accumulated wisdom of democrat campaign operatives?


That is a question that is carefully avoided by the promoters of the investigation."

10 posted on 05/30/2018 6:10:09 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The longer Muellar persists the higher Trump’s popularity climbs.


11 posted on 05/30/2018 6:10:17 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf
"What was the spear point that hit the target?"

The left can't handle the truth on this - that any collusion was against Trump, not for him. But they aren't to be deterred by this trivial matter, they are just trying to restore the rightful (leftful?) winner.

12 posted on 05/30/2018 7:16:21 AM PDT by HangThemHigh (Entropy is not what it used to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: odawg
he foundation of that question is: I know the Russians did something. Therefore, that “something” has to be obvious in order for there to be an investigation.

Actually, if it were obvious, we wouldn't need an investigation. We'd just go after the obvious thing.

The whole premise is that they have reason to believe Russia did something (a reason they created), and we need to investigate to find out what it was.

But that is a false pretext created by the Democrats, starting in 2015.

13 posted on 05/30/2018 2:22:03 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hsalaw

Those are teh Trump Democrats, formerly the Reagan Democrats.


14 posted on 05/30/2018 2:23:04 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer

Remember, when he was US Attorney in Boston, Mueller and his deputy knowingly kept four innocent men locked up for a long stretch just to protect a mobster — and not a small-time one, either, but the biggest mob boss in Boston.


15 posted on 05/30/2018 2:25:04 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TBP

The way the Democrats have been acting since election day 2016 is the longest sore loser, hissy fit in American history. They all have been acting guilty from day one. No wonder it’s becoming more believable.


16 posted on 05/30/2018 2:26:50 PM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: odawg
“What did Russia do?” You mean other than steal our uranium, withe the connivance of the BO-HRC regime, and support Clinton's bid for the White House?
17 posted on 05/30/2018 2:27:42 PM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“Actually, if it were obvious, we wouldn’t need an investigation.”

Not really. When a crime is committed it always requires an investigation.


18 posted on 05/30/2018 4:17:07 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“What did Russia do?”

Gowdy was referring to meddling with the election.


19 posted on 05/30/2018 4:18:26 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson