Posted on 05/28/2018 1:02:57 PM PDT by snarkpup
Lauren Southern interviews George Llewelyn-John.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
The fascist British government does not allow reporting on the trial of Mooslimb child-rapists who were aided and abetted by British law enforcement.
thanks for the tip!
British men ( small m ) except few a select few, have been emasculated. I don’t expect they will Fight at all, their Daughters will someday wear Burkas and be whipped in public for showing to much forehead.
“... abetted by British law enforcement.”
Or, “British law enfarcement.”
Thanks for that link, just shared it to FB. It’s interesting, I thought leaving the EU was in part at least to retain Britain’s autonomy, but it appears that they can suppress free speech, persecute political opponents (true opponents, not the two sides of the coin thing which currently holds all the power), and support the Muslim takeover of Britain just fine without any directives from the EU.
When I was in Air Force Tech School in 1975 a couple that lived down the hall were both Air Force Brats who had met in the dependents school in England. Mark was an Italian guy training as a radar tech and Patty was stacked beyond all comprehension. Patty said all the Brits were nancy boys and she thought they were repulsive.
The British men as a culture have been on a plunging descent for a while now.
The Brits have no Bill of Rights like the US.
“The Brits have no Bill of Rights like the US.”
They don’t have a constitution.
They have no law except what the King or Queen says.
That’s literally true til today.
Yes, the “English Bill of Rights” is a 1689 law, and makes no reference to certain fundamental natural rights which the government or popular vote shall not infringe. The US Constitution makes us unique among all nations, and it is good to recognize and appreciate that fact.
Yes, the Brits have a bill of Rights, it’s a bit older than ours...let’s see how it stacks up... (it is still in effect and has been augmented by the Act of Settlement in 1701.
The basic tenets of the English Bill of Rights 1689 are:
Englishmen, as embodied by Parliament, possessed certain immutable civil and political rights. These included:
freedom from royal interference with the law (the Sovereign was forbidden to establish his own courts or to act as a judge himself)
freedom from taxation by royal prerogative, without agreement by Parliament
freedom to petition the king
freedom from a peace-time standing army, without agreement by Parliament
freedom [for Protestants] to have arms for defense, as allowed by law
freedom to elect members of Parliament without interference from the Sovereign
the freedom of speech in Parliament, in that proceedings in Parliament were not to be questioned in the courts or in any body outside Parliament itself (the basis of modern parliamentary privilege)
freedom from cruel and unusual punishments, and excessive bail
freedom from fines and forfeitures without trial
The Monarchy have very little, if any, input on the laws of the land. The queen may mention something she would like, but the country is ruled by a Prime minister and a bicameral Parliment.
No freeman shall be taken, or imprisoned, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way harmed, nor will we go upon him nor will we send upon him, except by the legal judgement of his peers or by the law of the land. To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.
Magna Carta, Clause 39
Clause 39 guaranteeing the right of a freeman to a trial by his peers before he could be lawfully imprisoned is one of the most famous clauses in Magna Carta.
However, in Great Britain there are no more “free men”. Freedom died on March 11, 2005.
“The British Parliament adopted a new antiterrorist law, the Prevention of TerrorismAct, on March 11, 2005. By doing so, Parliament made it possible for the government to carry out the long-standing project of expanding the emergency provisions to which foreigners are subjected within the context of the war on terrorism to cover the whole population, including citizens. This change is important because it calls into question the notion of habeas corpus. The law attacks the formal separation of powers by giving to the secretary of state for home affairs judicial prerogatives. Further, it reduces the rights of the defense practically to nothing.”
I can’t care about Britain more than the British.
The UK has become a police state.
If the country isnt burning down right now, they are completely lost forever.
“The Monarchy have very little, if any, input on the laws of the land.”
True, yet only because the monarchy chooses so.
There is no constitution or “supreme law of the land” as we call it other than monarchy.
Yes there is. Google is your friend.
stacked beyond all comprehension.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.