Posted on 05/25/2018 12:21:50 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Tuesday, we broke down how based on publicly disclosed information, it is a logical and reasonable conclusion that politics played a major role in the origins of the FBI’s counterintelligence operation involving the Trump campaign and alleged connections with the Russian government.
Wednesday, investigative reporter Sharyl Atkisson amplified this idea at The Hill and laid out a devastating case:
(T)here’s a growing appearance of alleged wrongdoing equally as insidious, if not more so, because it implies widespread misuse of America’s intelligence and law enforcement apparatus.
Atkisson lays out eight major indications that the operation was directed at Trump, not the Kremlin, and was politically motivated.
Her observations include the plethora of wiretaps:
Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
They weren’t ‘spying’. They were planting evidence and suspicion.
The Apparatchik calls the elected official Christmas Help.
Ping
Exactly the hard left,Schiff types, have yet to prove that any foreign entity had anything more to do with elections than what is normal for opposing regimes that target the US 24/7.
THese to ladies are the gold standard in journalism,none better,maybe Bryon York or George Webb.
Just too good. The only thing I would have added would have been a muzzie prayer rug draped across his shoulder.
Great post Chuck! I try and never miss her show.
What a dweeb! Looks like the “new wave” reasoning being taught in Kalifornia skools is not serving you well.....troll.
Thanks for pinging the ping. Would you like to join the Sharyl ping list?
If the intelligence community were really investigating Russia, they would have been investigating the contacts and relationships with Hillary Clinton and her campaign as well as Trump’s. They were not.
Once Bernie Sanders became a threat to Hillary, I wonder if the FBI decided to “protect” him as well?
Because speed is the most important factor in this entire thing right now, huh?
Sheesh, that is the least important thing.
Getting all the little duckies in a row is the most important and critical factor, making certain that when he moves, he kills the king.
The king being the Deep State, and kills being the prosecution and imprisoning of the Deep State members.
And walks like a duck...
5.56mm
Obama would not be prosecuted anyway. The only thing that would happen is his reputation - and the Left's - would take a temporary hit. And this would quickly be spun away with some sort of mass MSM/DNC rationalization like: "This action was necessary because of how evil Trump is - and look what he has done since taking office! We were right to do it!"
Seems like a lot of damage is being done to our institutions just to stave off a temporary dent in Obama's halo.
Unless they are hiding something a lot bigger - the revelation of which really would trigger a civil war. Like that government resources were being spent enacting some Clinton Foundation/Soros master plan for the mass replacement of unruly American and European citizens with compliant Third World slaves. If Brennan, et al, are true believers, that would explain their frantic behavior lately - once exposed, such a plan would be dead for generations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.