Showing true colors.
I “want to” ban esquire. Stop murdering innocent trees to make paper so these losers can print their yellow sheet rag.
There’s so many guns that it would be a matter of only banning LEGAL guns. Get ready to pay protection money to both gangs and cops if that happens.
Too bad “Dave Holmes” wasn’t present when the Constitution was drafted.
Bring it by my house, David. Ill provide the address.
Pack a lunch. Itll be a long day.
Or not.
L
Go get them, tough guy. Let us know how that works out for you.
Yes, the lone honest Liberal.
Only after the government gives up all of it’s weapons.
Why don’t we just uninvent fire? That will solve a lot of problems too.
“nobody wants to take your guns away, nobody.”
- aspiring gun grabbers just waiting for someone to take your guns away.
NON print:
https://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/pj-gladnick/2018/05/20/esquire-editor-wants-ban-all-guns
Turns out Esquire editor Dave Holmes is a hysterical queen (open homosexual).
Sure, Dave. Grand idea. That will stop people from committing murder. Spontaneous rainbows will pop out and Unicorns will emerge from hiding. The days will all be sunny and the climate will stabilize to 73 degrees around the globe. ISIS will begin dancing with Mossad and everyone will give a Coca-Cola to each other.
I want David Holmes to swing from the tallest tree in Central Park.
That’s not going to happen, either.
The reason we need the Second Amendment is to protect ourselves from the fascist aholes who think like David Holmes.
Then do not allow any security at your magazine headquarters to carry firearms - this IS a free country no one can make you carry a gun.
Another fashion magazine turned political commie rag. I’m sure they’ll be out of circulation soon enough.
Unfortunately, emotional responses to DO SOMETHING often do more harm than good.
In this case, those pushing for more unconstitutional restrictions on gun ownership and use are all to happy to inflict harm on others with their emotional response.
The author likely does not own any guns or see any use for them.
So, he sees no harm to banning them, restricting them, confiscating them, trashing the Second Amendment, and eliminating constitutional constraints on police action.
But there are severe damages done with these actions. They trash the rule of law. They trash the idea of limited government. They attack the very idea of Constitutional rights.
Thy attack the idea of reasonable response.
Before the Media made celebrities of school shooters, mass school shootings were rare events.
Before the federal government made schools into gun free zones, these were rare events.
Lets repeal the gun free school zone laws before we attack the Constitution.
Lets see the media adopt reasonable restrictions on making mass shooters in celebrities, before we adopt their favored agenda of more Second Amendment infringements.
The potential harm of the emotional DO SOMETHING response is large, real, and relevant.
I can’t imagine buying a magazine these days. They’re all ads and sleazy articles.
I want free chocolate.......................