Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A reckoning is coming for blue states
The Washington Post ^ | May 17, 2018 | Megan McArdle

Posted on 05/17/2018 4:17:01 PM PDT by re_tail20

Before the ink was dry on our new tax bill, outraged blue states were screaming about the cap on the deductibility of state and local taxes. Their governments were also frantically seeking ways around it, and small wonder. For decades, high-tax states with a lot of wealthy residents enjoyed a hefty subsidy from the rest of America. Legislators were understandably panicked over what voters might do when handed the rest of the bill.

That panic generated some desperate ideas. The most popular, currently, is allowing people to convert tax payments above the $10,000 cap into a "charitable donation." New York, New Jersey and Connecticut have already passed laws to allow this.

While charmingly innovative, this approach is likely to fall afoul of tax courts, as will the other proposed tactics. Blue-state taxpayers may finally have to confront the full cost of the government they want. And Democrats will finally have to confront the tension between what those voters want government to do and what they're willing to pay for.

That reckoning is long overdue.

Remember the Bush tax cuts, first passed in 2001? A heartless giveaway to the rich that did nothing for the middle class, Democrats said. But when their expiration date approached, President Barack Obama called for raising taxes only on families making more than $250,000 annually — that being, apparently, what it now takes to call yourself "rich."

This absurdity is no accident. It's a function of the ideological beliefs of the Democratic activist base clashing with the geographic and demographic distribution of their voters.

Over the past few decades, the United States has undergone "the Big Sort," the clumping of the electorate into demographically, professionally and politically homogeneous neighborhoods. Hillary Clinton voters have their ZIP codes, and Donald Trump voters theirs, and ever more rarely do...

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2018midterms; bluestates; taxandspend; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: Alberta's Child

“A lot of reasons for that” aside, it’s still a subsidy.


61 posted on 05/17/2018 7:15:48 PM PDT by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
1. Are you going to suggest that those "red" states on that list pay more Federal taxes per capita than, say, California or New York? LOL.

2. A comparison based on raw numbers is pointless. That's why all of these reports are based on per-capita spending, taxes, etc. Otherwise, California would rank #1 in the U.S. by every measure -- positive AND negative. Most food stamp recipients, most taxpayers, most criminals, most police officers, most white people, most minorities, etc.

I'll post some other links tomorrow when I'm back at my desk.

62 posted on 05/17/2018 7:19:15 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

Baloney. See Post #40. The taxpayers in these high-tax states that were allegedly being subsidized were already paying far more in Federal taxes than their low-tax counterparts even WITH the state tax deduction still in place.


63 posted on 05/17/2018 7:23:05 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Conflating again.


64 posted on 05/17/2018 7:23:25 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

I don’t think you even know what you’re talking about. That post references Federal taxes only.


65 posted on 05/17/2018 7:25:24 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: PGalt
DEFUND socialist/totalitarian collectives, foreign and domestic.<<<

Nope!..make them do it themselves..with their “secret vote”.....Everyone does whats in their own best interest when push comes to shove..

they might still talk liberalism...but they dammed sure wont support it with their own money...lol..I know lots of liberals...tighter then a screw when it comes to taxes they pay

66 posted on 05/17/2018 7:27:11 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
A comparison based on raw numbers is pointless.

Complete BS on your part. Post the verifiable bases for your assertion that federal tax payers in blue states receive a smaller percentage of their federal taxes back. Otherwise you are just blowing smoke. My personal belief is that liberal cities would die in less then 3 days without the federal government paying the lions share of their food, utilities, housing, education, law enforcement and Iphone bills. But I don't make that assertion because I don't have the facts to back it up.
67 posted on 05/17/2018 7:28:30 PM PDT by JoSixChip (He is Batman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

The subsidies referred to state taxation that was correctly stated in the article. Which you have yet to prove false.


68 posted on 05/17/2018 7:35:57 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip
Like I said ... I'll post more links tomorrow. I'm posting on my phone right now, and it's a pain in the ass to post links on it.

What you're going to find is that these liberal cities that get a lot of Federal money also have a lot of taxpayers -- and in cities these taxpayers are in higher tax brackets than their rural counterparts. That's why small, densely populated states pay a disproportionate amount of Federal taxes. They have a lot of middle-class people paying in upper-income tax brackets because wages and the cost of living are higher.

And two of the biggest factors in the gap between Federal taxes paid and Federal expenditures received are military bases and Indian reservations ... because these places get a lot of Federal money but don't have wealthy taxpayers.

That last point explains why rural states like New Mexico and Oklahoma proportionally have a lot of people on food stamps, by the way.

69 posted on 05/17/2018 7:43:38 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

I did prove it false. See Post #40. If you’re going to claim that a state where the average resident pays less than $5,000 in Federal taxes is subsidizing a state where the average resident pays $12,000 in Federal taxes, then I’m not sure what kind of math you’re using.


70 posted on 05/17/2018 7:47:29 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

P.S. — West Virginia, which has no big cities at all, is one of the biggest welfare states in the U.S. Every other road and building in that state is named after former Senator Robert Byrd (D-KKK) because the place would have been completely depopulated years ago without massive Federal government support.


71 posted on 05/17/2018 7:51:51 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The taxpayers in these high-tax states that were allegedly being subsidized were already paying far more in Federal taxes than their low-tax counterparts even WITH the state tax deduction still in place.<<<

OK..lets give you that point for arguments sake..Tell me why they pay more then their fair share then?

72 posted on 05/17/2018 7:56:46 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

How can you prove it false when keep talking about federal taxation when the article was clearly demonstrating that state taxes are subsidized?


73 posted on 05/17/2018 7:57:23 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: deadrock

How are the state taxes subsidized? The author claims that allowing state taxes to be deducted on Federal tax returns is a “subsidy” ... but even with that state tax deduction those high-tax states still paid far more in Federal taxes than other low-tax states. That’s what I demonstrated in Post #40.


74 posted on 05/17/2018 8:07:25 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: M-cubed

If I pay $12,000 in Federal taxes and you pay $5,000 I’d say one of us is paying more than his fair share ... and it ain’t you.


75 posted on 05/17/2018 8:09:41 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
But federal taxes are separate from state taxes or local taxes.

High populated states sure do pay more FEDERAL taxes. But that has nothing to do with state taxes or who is responsible for paying state taxes. Nothing.

76 posted on 05/17/2018 8:13:47 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Nothing to do with state taxes.


77 posted on 05/17/2018 8:14:23 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


78 posted on 05/17/2018 8:16:56 PM PDT by bitt (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Anyway, off to bed. Thanks for debate. Talk again sometime.


79 posted on 05/17/2018 8:27:03 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: deadrock
Please explain to me how states with high state taxes are subsidized by low-tax states. The author makes that claim in the first paragraph.

Nobody in Alabama, for example, pays state taxes in Connecticut ... so how exactly does this "subsidy" work?

80 posted on 05/17/2018 8:37:03 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson