Skip to comments.
Chuck Schumer introduces bill to decriminalize marijuana
Washington Examiner ^
| April 20, 2018
| Susan Ferrechio
Posted on 04/20/2018 9:12:02 AM PDT by NobleFree
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
1
posted on
04/20/2018 9:12:02 AM PDT
by
NobleFree
To: NobleFree
Anything to create a controversy while Republicans are in the majority.
2
posted on
04/20/2018 9:14:24 AM PDT
by
rockinqsranch
(Conservatives seek the truth. Democrats seek the power to dictate what truth is.)
To: NobleFree
Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a statement. My thinking, as well as the general populations views on the issue has evolved">He has some seriously wrong thinking there.
3
posted on
04/20/2018 9:15:17 AM PDT
by
bgill
(CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
To: All
4
posted on
04/20/2018 9:15:46 AM PDT
by
JonPreston
(I post To: "All" because article posters rarely contribute to their own threads)
To: NobleFree
Schroomer?
Who could have seen this coming?
5
posted on
04/20/2018 9:15:55 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
To: NobleFree
The problem is more and more people have tried it and are now aware that it is NOT the dangerous addictive evil gateway drug the govt said it is.
6
posted on
04/20/2018 9:16:21 AM PDT
by
rawcatslyentist
("All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing")
To: NobleFree
Another dummocrap effort to destroy any intellectual discernment capacity in voters. Drug ‘em, then they’ll swallow dummocrap nonsense without any resistance.
7
posted on
04/20/2018 9:16:27 AM PDT
by
EinNYC
To: NobleFree
Ok by me. Reefer Madness is idiotic.
8
posted on
04/20/2018 9:16:27 AM PDT
by
Basket_of_Deplorables
(Trump has implemented Supply Side Economics!!!)
To: NobleFree
Stopped clock, blind squirrel.
9
posted on
04/20/2018 9:16:42 AM PDT
by
bassmaner
(Hey commies: I am a' white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
To: NobleFree
Makes sense; only a dope would vote for a democrat.
10
posted on
04/20/2018 9:16:45 AM PDT
by
Pietro
To: bgill
He has some seriously wrong thinking there.How so? Where in the Constitution is the federal government granted authority over the intrastate growing, selling, or using of marijuana?
11
posted on
04/20/2018 9:17:19 AM PDT
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Leftist base signaling.
Stoner virtue signaling.
Smoke signaling.
12
posted on
04/20/2018 9:17:23 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(...the light has come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light...)
To: NobleFree
To: NobleFree
The democrats are really evil and will turn us into a cesspool.
14
posted on
04/20/2018 9:18:24 AM PDT
by
Williams
(Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
To: EinNYC
Another dummocrap effort to destroy any intellectual discernment capacity in voters.Like the relegalization of alcohol that ended Prohibition?
15
posted on
04/20/2018 9:18:30 AM PDT
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: NobleFree
Why in the world would dedicated funding streams for women and minority businesses to grow and distribute the drug be something the FedGov would need to provide?
16
posted on
04/20/2018 9:18:49 AM PDT
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: NobleFree
Feds go legal its over
I doubt they will
17
posted on
04/20/2018 9:18:53 AM PDT
by
wardaddy
(As a southerner I've never trusted the Grand Old Party.....any questions?)
To: NobleFree
I agree with him.
There is no reason for a person who smokes weed to face legal jeopardy.
There is just no reason for that.
18
posted on
04/20/2018 9:19:02 AM PDT
by
chris37
("I am everybody." -Mark Robinson)
To: MarvinStinson
Pothead Nation.Has legal alcohol made us a boozer nation? If not, why would legal pot make us a pothead nation?
19
posted on
04/20/2018 9:19:46 AM PDT
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: FreedomPoster
Why in the world would dedicated funding streams for women and minority businesses to grow and distribute the drug be something the FedGov would need to provide?It's not (but you knew that); I hope the GOP proposes an amendment to strip this provision.
20
posted on
04/20/2018 9:22:03 AM PDT
by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-130 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson