To: NobleFree
Why in the world would “dedicated funding streams” for women and minority businesses to grow and distribute the drug be something the FedGov would need to provide?
16 posted on
04/20/2018 9:18:49 AM PDT by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: FreedomPoster
Why in the world would “dedicated funding streams” for women and minority businesses to grow and distribute the drug be something the FedGov would need to provide?It's not (but you knew that); I hope the GOP proposes an amendment to strip this provision.
20 posted on
04/20/2018 9:22:03 AM PDT by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: FreedomPoster
Notice the phrase ‘women and minority’..
It’s a vote-buying scheme.
To: FreedomPoster
Why in the world would “dedicated funding streams” for women and minority businesses to grow and distribute the drug be something the FedGov would need to provide? Because if they don't the newly-legal business will be dominated by those evil competent white men.
To: FreedomPoster
Women and minorities hardest bong-hit!
115 posted on
04/21/2018 3:09:38 AM PDT by
Tolerance Sucks Rocks
(The US Constitution ....... Invented by geniuses and God .... Administered by morons ......)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson