Posted on 04/15/2018 12:45:47 PM PDT by Enlightened1
Macron says France has convinced Trump to "stay in Syria long-term"
https://twitter.com/AFP/status/985594653075439616
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
Not good at all.
Wrong answer.
Oh Nooooo! We are back to WW3!!!!!!!!!
Fake news unless and until demonstrated otherwise.
Sacrebleu !
Nooooo!
Fake news....
FU Macron.
let france take the lead and stay long term
Democrats are salivating to dust off the nightly news casualty counters and start the trump lied people died chants
These are the type of threads where the posters sound exactly like moonbat crazy leftists and liberals.
I mean exactly the same. Same hysteria and drama queen manner.
Etc...
Since when has President Trump been listening to French Socialists for leadership?
The last time I looked France is a h#ll hole.
This sounds like the Deep State has gotten to President Trump?
I call BS
I’m trying to be open-minded and wait and see how this shakes out.
Just praying this is ‘fake news.’
Waiting for the official word.
Questions: do you want ISIS back in Syria?
Would Assad have held Syria if Trump hadn’t defeated ISIS?
i am not happy with ‘staying in Syria long term’ ... at least, not with large scale ground forces.
and...ESPECIALLY if we’re going to continue to IGNORE (protect? enable?) the largest and most dangerous Muslim terrorist murder gang in Syria and Lebanon (Hezballah), this gang supplies many/most of the forces that are killing people there.. and it represents the greatest threat to world peace due to its Satanic blood-thirst, extremely active deployments in numerous locations in Lebanon and Syria, and of course its constant threats to murder more and more innocent people... and Hezballah appears to be constantly stirring up conflicts, fights, battles in Syria..between other groups, forces, armies. As long as we are in there, we should definitely eliminate (not just attack or injure) Hezballah (AND THIS CAN LARGELY BE ACHIEVED WITH A FEW DAY’S SERIOUS AERIAL BOMBARDMENT... we do NOT need to use large ground forces to win THIS one...I have never understood and still don’t understand the large ground commitments when we have such a wonderful USAF... take out what’s left of the Syrian air force and any S-300 or similar missiles that might have gotten snuck into Syria or Lebanon .. take out Hezballah and its reported 150,000 smaller rocket bombs (they’re reportedly mostly stored up all in a small area, should be fairly easy to just incinerate, melt that that area, annihilate it from the air)...I do not see why we would need any large ground presence for any extended period of time. Effective maintenance of any areas we clear of enemy forces can then be achieved from the air and with very minimal manning on the ground for intelligence or perimeter monitoring purposes. Why send in long-term large scale forces if, as I believe, they’re not necessary? Perhaps the generals know better but if large scale long term ground forces are needed anywhere in these shitcan countries...I’d sure appreciate the generals to explain it...so at least we can understand
Well most of the replies are barely 4 words strung together.
Because who needs corroboration? Just react.
“THIS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE!!!11!!”
Like what is? A tweet based on something that Trump hasn’t said himself?
Unlike you NeverTrumpers some of us wait to see what Trump has to say and do. Some of us are just getting over the N Korea nuclear war.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.