Skip to comments.
Judge says officials must consider reduced coal mining to address climate change
Casper Star-Tribune ^
| March 26, 2018
| Associated Press
Posted on 03/27/2018 8:58:54 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot
All of the US Gov’t is apparently deeply involved in Legislation EXCEPT Congress.
What is wrong with this picture?
21
posted on
03/27/2018 9:13:16 AM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What actual law was this based on?
22
posted on
03/27/2018 9:14:33 AM PDT
by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
This is just nucking futs, even without the judicial activism.
Powder River Coal is cheaper and has less sulfur than Appalachin Basin coal.
Our citizens do not receive education, just indoctrination.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What law did the (activist masquerading as a) “judge” cite to justify his ruling?
24
posted on
03/27/2018 9:16:47 AM PDT
by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Return to sender. Address unknown!
25
posted on
03/27/2018 9:17:05 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
There’s one begging to be overturned.
26
posted on
03/27/2018 9:17:32 AM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh, look - a Federal judge-president has weighed in...
27
posted on
03/27/2018 9:19:13 AM PDT
by
kiryandil
(Never pick a fight with an angry beehive)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Did the lawyer from the Government stipulate to the strawman climate change argument? There’s a whole series of arguments that would need to be proven before you ever get ‘round to “and coal mining should be reduced”.
28
posted on
03/27/2018 9:19:52 AM PDT
by
alancarp
(George Orwell was an optimist.)
To: kiryandil
This is an Obama Judicial Dictator.
29
posted on
03/27/2018 9:21:04 AM PDT
by
CMailBag
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Ok. Considering... ... ... and, no.
30
posted on
03/27/2018 9:21:38 AM PDT
by
dead
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Does this have something to do with the Law, or some recent issue of
New York Magazine?
ML/NJ
31
posted on
03/27/2018 9:24:45 AM PDT
by
ml/nj
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Adjudge doesn’t have the authority to regulate climate
32
posted on
03/27/2018 9:30:07 AM PDT
by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No, they don’t. Judges don’t set policy.
33
posted on
03/27/2018 9:32:10 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republicans took their slaves away.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No, they don’t. Judges don’t set policy.
34
posted on
03/27/2018 9:32:10 AM PDT
by
CodeToad
(The Democrats haven't been this pissed off since the Republicans took their slaves away.)
To: Nifster
“That better be appealed”
I think a blanket party in the parking lot would be more effective.
35
posted on
03/27/2018 9:32:38 AM PDT
by
bk1000
(I stand with Trump)
To: oldplayer
[[I couldnt get my mind around mounting and filling up those tires.]]
You gotta have a good set of lungs to fill them up
36
posted on
03/27/2018 9:33:24 AM PDT
by
Bob434
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Lease the lands or give them back to the native Americans. Lets see the bastards stop it then.
37
posted on
03/27/2018 9:36:15 AM PDT
by
crz
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The Powder River coal deposits are estimated to be slightly greater than 1 trillion tons.
They are being mined at a rate slightly in excess of 1 million tons per day (that’s a train consisting of 100 cars, each containing 100 tons of coal, every 15 minutes, 24 hours per day).
If it had been mined at that rate, starting at the time of Christ, it could continue to be mined for another 500 years into the future.
And that’s only a small part of the overall world coal deposits.
And all that carbon was once in the atmosphere.
38
posted on
03/27/2018 9:36:47 AM PDT
by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: bk1000
39
posted on
03/27/2018 9:37:08 AM PDT
by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Unless there are an airtight, scientific proof that any of this "climate change" claptrap is valid, the legal actions should be turned away as the frivolous behavior they represent. Do it in a "loser pays" setting. Make it hurt financially to keep pushing stupid lawsuits.
40
posted on
03/27/2018 9:37:57 AM PDT
by
Myrddin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson