Skip to comments.
Experts: Uber self-driving system should have spotted woman
AP ^
| March 22, 2018
| TOM KRISHER and JACQUES BILLEAUD
Posted on 03/22/2018 9:31:12 AM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
No exerpt.
Video of accident at link.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: autonomous; uber
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 next last
To: DiogenesLamp
"I'm thinking a human would not only have had their brights on, they would have also been watching the road." When driving on a well-lighted roadway? Mebbeso...
121
posted on
03/22/2018 3:05:38 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
To: Sacajaweau
Thanks -- but "Linkee no Workee..." '-)
122
posted on
03/22/2018 3:08:24 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
To: TXnMA
Sorry Charlie,
1) arguing its was dark and difficult to see is case against the driver for driving too fast for the conditions. Recall drivers ed where they taught you NEVER to drive faster than your headlights illuminate.
2) As all of us know, the camera image is ALWAYS darker than what the human eye sees. Added that this is a classic low res. camera, Elaine the victim was able to be seen at least 300 feet away. More than enough time to prevent killing her.
3) Finally, the onus is always on the person operating a deadly weapon in the public space. Its not on the victim to prove she behaved correctly.
123
posted on
03/22/2018 3:20:47 PM PDT
by
vooch
(America First Drain the Swamp)
To: EVO X
Agreed - in most jurisdictions this would be a case of negligent homicide ( perhaps with some mitigating factors )
124
posted on
03/22/2018 3:22:55 PM PDT
by
vooch
(America First Drain the Swamp)
To: bramps
And there’s shockingly many who would consider that a laudable solution.
125
posted on
03/22/2018 3:32:04 PM PDT
by
ctdonath2
(The Red Queen wasn't kidding.)
To: EVO X
People Radar In 1969 Army ROTC we were shown the AN/PPS-5 Ground Surveillance Radar. It was used to detect people moving around the perimeter at night. This was a live night time demonstration. It worked.
Young folks need to work with the older ones. You'd be surprised what we know that you don't.
126
posted on
03/22/2018 3:32:36 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: TXnMA
Try googling a few of the words....worth reading...
To: TXnMA
I assume I would have hit her just like the stupid car did. And when I say stupid, I mean stupid, because it didn't even try to do anything.
The issue is not reaction time however, since the woman was doomed. The issue is whether we can recognize a human pushing a bicycle. We can. The computer cannot / could not. That is painfully obvious.
128
posted on
03/22/2018 3:33:49 PM PDT
by
palmer
(...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
To: TXnMA
link worked for me just now
To: Former Proud Canadian
Woman should have spotted car!
Woman should have looked both ways!
Jaywalking has a Darwinian beauty to it.
130
posted on
03/22/2018 3:34:33 PM PDT
by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
To: GingisK
LOL, not mine...wish it thought it was too slow.
131
posted on
03/22/2018 3:35:27 PM PDT
by
Ambrosia
(Southern born... NC, and have lived in PA, NY,WV,SC, NM, FL, NC....Love USA!)
To: vooch
" Recall drivers ed where they taught you NEVER to drive faster than your headlights illuminate." Somebody finally got it!
Ya think they maybe should send "self-driving" car programmers to that class?
132
posted on
03/22/2018 3:41:09 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
To: Ozark Tom
A proper mix of sensors and maybe even a splash of analog processing could go a long way toward reflex-like responses.
133
posted on
03/22/2018 3:46:20 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Former Proud Canadian; All
134
posted on
03/22/2018 3:47:17 PM PDT
by
musicman
(The future is just a collection of successive nows.)
To: vooch
What is the matter with you? Are you SANE? ;-D
135
posted on
03/22/2018 3:47:31 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: TXnMA
I think Uber drivers should go on strike in order to stop this research that would put them out of a job. ;-D
136
posted on
03/22/2018 3:50:30 PM PDT
by
GingisK
To: Sacajaweau
137
posted on
03/22/2018 3:55:03 PM PDT
by
TXnMA
("Allah": Satan's current alias; "0bama": Allah's stooge; "Moderate Muslims": Allah's useful idiots.)
To: TXnMA
Only on FR would you get this kind of analysis. In the tradition of Buckhead.
I have another question about this incident. Does the camera lens gather as much light as the human eye? In other words, are the night vision abilities of the camera equal to that of the human eye?
To: COBOL2Java
139
posted on
03/22/2018 4:19:47 PM PDT
by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
To: DiogenesLamp
Equip them with "cow catchers"?!
140
posted on
03/22/2018 4:26:58 PM PDT
by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson