Posted on 03/20/2018 12:45:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Polygraph tests taken in 2011 by Stormy Daniels and her ex-husband Michael Mosney support Daniels accounts that she had unprotected sex with President Trump in July 2006, according to a report Tuesday.
A polygraph examiner specifically asked Daniels in 2011 if she had "unprotected sex" with Trump in July of 2006. According to records published by the Wall Street Journal, Daniels was truthful when she answered "yes."
Before taking the lie-detector test in 2011, Life & Style Magazine allegedly offered Clifford $15,000 to share the story about her affair with Trump after Daniel's agent reached out to them, the WSJ reports. After interviewing and taking the polygraph, the magazine contacted Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen to request a comment.
Cohen reportedly threatened to sue the magazine and Life & Style decided not to publish the story.
Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 in hush money so she would not discuss her alleged relationship with Trump. Daniels signed a nondisclosure agreement in 2016, but Daniels filed a lawsuit this month calling for it to be nullified because Trump failed to sign it.
Daniel's lawyer, Michael Avenatti, did not extensively comment on Daniel's attempted to sell the story of her affair with Trump in 2011.
“Unfortunately, and despite the prior WSJ reporting which was credible, this story is far more fiction than fact. Too many inaccuracies to count,” Avenatti said in a written statement, according to The Wall Street Journal.
You mean The Donald was not a monk for the last 20 years?
The Dems don’t understand, everyone knows who he was when they voted for him and don’t care. You cannot change a guy who everyone knew who he was.
How many times can you go to the politics of personal destruction w/o everyone knowing what you are doing?
OJ can probably pass a polygraph asserting he didn’t cut his wife’s head off.
So, yeah, this means nothing.
But keep trying, lamestream media.
Stormy’s book must not be selling well. Needs more pimping by the MSM.
Did the questions contain the word “is” - I ask because as Cllinton said, it depends on what is the meaning of “is.”
a good polygraph operator can get most any result he/she wants. Sometimes how much money passes under the table dictates what the polygraph will reveal, so I’ve heard.
her passing a “lie detector” only proves that she believed it happened.
It’s not evidence.
Do we care?
In general, adultery isn’t a good thing. Major sin and all. But this is not important right now. It seems many of our best leaders have committed this and countless other sins. Ronald Reagan may have cheated on his first wife. It doesn’t take away from all the good things he did.
We need as a People fighting a dangerous oligarchy NOT TO CARE about the marital failings of the one guy with a big enough wallet and ego to dare lead our fight!!!
Exactly.. Leftists are still the Biggest Hypocrites Alive.. and they are proud of it!
Xanax and, being a typical whore, a professional liar - which is why lie detectors aren’t admissible in court.
in 2011, only answered two that seemed to confirm an encounter. One of the ones she failed was ‘did Trump promise to put you on the Apprentice (to revive your career)?”
the thing is, with everything already being said in spite of a NDA, what’s left to tell? But blackmailers are never the smartest chapter in the book in spite of their ambulance-chasing lawyers looking for a 45percent cut (they used to call those taking 45percent of a woman’s money a pimp).
She looks like she had unprotected sex with a lot of married men.
They’re trying to replicate the Roy Moore effect where they drive Evangelicals to stay home on election day.
Trump has proven his strength and worth to us, and if he on occasion has failed his wife, we shouldn’t be too bothered. Many a good person has allowed themselves to be led sexually astray.
There is a reason why lie detector results are not admissible in court. They are often inaccurate.
There's a reason they are STILL not admissible in a court of law.
And as far as we know, the President is not “banging someone else” while serving. He is focused on the fight. I wish he hadn’t cheated on his wife but it’s all in all not that important.
Let me know when he
a. has sex with someone employed by the executive branch
and
b. is sued by someone else for sexual harassment
and
c. lies about a. to a grand jury and to the American people.
Until then, I’ll let his wife deal with it. (If it was true, he was a liberal acting like a liberal back then. If we’re going to start throwing those stones, there are a lot of glass houses that will get caught in the crossfire.
Bathhouse Barry had unprotected anal sex with multiple queer partners.
When Larry Sinclair took a real lie detector test, not the one set up against him by Obama’s people, he passed with flying colors.
So did Obama’s gay boyfriend.
If this is any reflection on Trump’s performance in office, we should rush some porn stars over to Paul Ryan, Mitch McConnell, and Jeff Sessions ASAP.
It wasn’t a grand jury, was it. Just a deposition of some kind. It has been a while - still lied in sworn testimony. Still can’t practice law because of it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.