Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grania

Respectfully, I think you and I probably agree on a great many subjects, my friend. But on this one... maybe not :^)

Those SA peoples’ lives matter more than what those groups you’d mentioned do.

“... cave to Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and the other people whose goal it is to make the US less white...”

And if we don’t push back on them - at every opportunity, that goal will succeed, and in a few decades, the same thing will be happening here, eventually.

If the people we elect to serve our purposes don’t do the job, they need to be removed and replaced with those who will.

I’m fine with the Aussies, Russians, and Canada helping out. I just think we should too.

“... We’d end up getting the worst of the worst along with a handful of whites who lost their land....”

We’ve already GOT that - Somali muzz, Middle East “refugees”, etc., that were forced upon every town in this country during the regime that we threw out in November 2016.

These SA people ARE genuine refugees, being threatened with murder - the others I mentioned, not so much.


185 posted on 03/17/2018 8:03:28 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: NFHale
I agree with you. What we're disagreeing about is whether the nation can be saved. I'm a realist. It's hard to believe that President Trump would've given up his very wonderful life to try to save the nation if he knew just how polluted the DC swamp is. Republicans who danced the conservative dance until their votes would accomplish something are voting against us, every time. If we let white farmers in? First thing the DC maniacs and special groups would demand is a color-blind or equality test. There are plenty of rogue judges who would support their views.Then you'd get the sinners with the saved. It's just like when we got compassionate about Chechynan refugees and Syrians. We got the Tsarnov brothers and ISIS in the US.

The globalists want a degraded world population (except for themselves) which they can control. Where do those who have the DNA that produced the (former) greatness of our laws, invention and civilization have a chance to not be bred out in just a few generations? That would be Australia, Hungary, Poland, Canada, New Zealand, and Russia.

DNA isn't destiny, it's tendency. A nation can afford to absorb a small percentage of those who can't handle the prevailing civilization. Beyond that number, they'll either be slaves or criminals. At this point, the only way to save the US is in certain localized pockets that still have the talent and means to preserve greatness. Is it really worth the risk of opening up our borders to countries that have a majority population that can't or won't assimilate?

Conspiracy Theory, for sure. But you know what? I'm not taking back any of it!

186 posted on 03/17/2018 9:17:43 AM PDT by grania (Deplorable and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson