Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: amihow

As an engineer we were taught to use a 2.5 safety factor. This looks like they used .9


40 posted on 03/15/2018 11:41:57 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: DaxtonBrown

What does that mean, 2.5 factor?


46 posted on 03/15/2018 11:44:47 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: DaxtonBrown
As an engineer we were taught to use a 2.5 safety factor. This looks like they used 0.9

That was my first thought. Although I never worked as an engineer, I have two degrees. And as someone who is always building something, this just doesnt look right, not strong enough, even with those trusses, but what do I know..

How it was supposed to be...:

79 posted on 03/15/2018 11:53:50 AM PDT by Paradox (Don't call them mainstream, there is nothing mainstream about the MSM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: DaxtonBrown
"As an engineer we were taught to use a 2.5 safety factor."

As an engineer in training I was taught that in civil engineering (bridges and such), the factor was 5. Early sixties.

234 posted on 03/15/2018 12:50:29 PM PDT by matthew fuller (Donald J. Trump- El Presidente Por La Vida!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson