Posted on 03/13/2018 8:56:01 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
ational Geographic has admitted its past reporting on different cultures around the world was racist.
The US magazine acknowledged in an editorial that for decades its coverage was racist, adding that the only way to rise above its past was to acknowledge it.
For its upcoming issue, dedicated solely to race and how it defines, separates, and unites us, the magazine asked a preeminent historian to examine the publications own history.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
So, I guess they’ll recall all those issues with bare breasted native women?..................
They want to call themselves racist? Have at it.
It is their idiot embrace of man-caused Global Warming that made me vow never to pick up their magazine again, even if I am stuck in a dentist office waiting for a root canal.
From my cold dead hand ...
and accuse their readers of being racists for having read their magazine.
“So, I guess theyll recall all those issues with bare breasted native women?..................”
Too late for that.
The only fair thing to do now is to publish pictures of bare-breasted white women, until the numbers of such photos equals the past number of bare-breasted non-white women.
No more naked African chicks? I remember that as a kid.
It’s kinda comical how so many today want to deny how the world works and thinks they can ignore human nature. Good luck with that.
That, and the unbelievable stench that their Earth-saving-greenie-weenie ink gave off when the magazine arrived. We banned them from our house in the early 2000s for that reason alone. Couldn't pick it up to read it for a month until the smell dissipated.
I recall those bare breasted native women very well. Most beautiful were Balinese & Polynesian gals.
;^)
Don’t go bashing on them nekkd natives. As a yute that’s all we had. Of course the Sears catlaog, too.
NG covered sh*thole countries before sh*thole countries were cool.
The main difference between Nat Geo and Playboy is that brown breasts are less sinful than white ones.
;^)
This is a smart move on the part of NG:
It’ll give them an excuse to devote more coverage to Global Warming.
If it gets hot, hot, hot as NG fervently believes, won’t that necessitate more bare breasted wimmen (especially those at whiter northen latitudes)?
Taught a lot of us the importance of a bra.
Naked white women=pornography
Naked black women=anthropology.
Taught a lot of us the importance of a bra.
And you’re right. :)
National Geographic has committed the sin of showing the earth as it is.
They had topless Polynesian girls??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.