To: GIdget2004
Anybody know if this was an individual judge’s decision or the whole court/
3 posted on
02/26/2018 6:42:35 AM PST by
kenmcg
(tHE WHOLE)
To: kenmcg
Sorry for the above I see it took four judges to make the decision. Blood will be on their hands should a terrorist from one of these countries act against the USA.
14 posted on
02/26/2018 6:44:48 AM PST by
kenmcg
(tHE WHOLE)
To: kenmcg
Chief Justice ultimately decides what case will be reviewed - Bloody John Roberts strikes again?
22 posted on
02/26/2018 6:47:43 AM PST by
Psalm 73
("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
To: kenmcg
"The court said the government's request for the court to hear its case is denied without prejudice. "It is assumed that the court of appeals will proceed expeditiously to decide this case," the court said. The justices provided no further explanation for their decision. It takes four justices to agree to hear a case."
Four is hard to reach when it's been shown that the nation's highest courts have been corrupted! 3 for = Thomas, Gorsuch and Alito; 5 against = Roberts, Ginsburg, Kennedy (retiring?), Kagan & the "wise latina" (presumably)
To: kenmcg
The article stated that it takes the acceptance of four justices to hear a case, so I want to know who didn’t accept and what their reasons for doing so were.
To: kenmcg
Anybody know if this was an individual judges decision or the whole court/Full Court. No dissent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson