Replies

I'm sticking with Patterson. He's the only viable "not George Pee Bush" candidate running. He has a proven reliably conservative record, used to be Texas Land Commissioner and actually DID his job while in office, UNLIKE his successor George Pee.

Also, I'm 99% certain George Pee only "endorsed" Trump because he "had to" as a Republican running for office in Texas. It wouldn't surprise me if privately, George Pee voted for Hilderbeast like the rest of his relatives. Unfortunately, George Pee's worthless "endorsement" (which had absolutely no effect on the outcome of the Presidential race) fooled a lot of FReepers into thinking Pee is "different from the rest of his family", when that clearly wasn't the case.

I wouldn't advocate openly voting or campaigning for the RAT if Pee wins the nomination (which sounds like cutting off your nose to spit in your face), but to be perfectly honest, if I lived in Texas and the general election "choices" were either George Pee or a RAT, I'd likely left that part of the ballot blank. I don't care if George Pee's opponent is Satan himself, I am sick to death of this guy getting a cushy six-figure salary statewide political job because of his last name.