Posted on 02/21/2018 1:45:25 PM PST by cotton1706
President Donald Trump needs reinforcements in the senate.
And he has a massive opportunity to replace obstructionist liberals with Republicans.
There are 10 Democrat senators that are up for re-election in states that Trump claimed victory in during the 2016 election — he will potentially be able to counter out establishment Republican senators with small-government conservatives.
Here are their names — vote them out:
Debbie Stabenow (Michigan)
Bob Casey Jr. (Pennsylvania)
Sherrod Brown (Ohio)
Joe Manchin (West Virginia)
Bill Nelson (Florida)
Joe Donnelly (Indiana)
Claire McCaskill (Missouri)
Jon Tester (Montana)
Heidi Heitkamp (North Dakota)
Tammy Baldwin (Wisconsin)
(Excerpt) Read more at conservativestories.com ...
Wouldn’t that be wonderful!
How does North Dakota elect a Democrat anything?
TRUMP needs to single them out , let the voters in each state know that the Senator did not support giving them their own money back. Then call for their firing.
Would LOVE to see a senate with 60+ Republicans, conservatives all the better.
A filibuster proof Senate would be good. Article V would be best.
Debbie Stabenow is just a nasty dumpster fire of a creature.
I think the Republicans should easily gain 5 seats in the Senate.
Indiana
Missouri
Montana
North Dakota
West Virginia
...possibly others...
If the dems lose seats they are FINISHED
They know this.
They are going to go all out with voter fraud.
That is how Judge Moore lost with 95% turnout in Democrat districts. ALL FRAUD
THEY ARE DEAD AND THEY KNOW IT IF THEY LOSE
WE MUST GET A HANDLE ON VOTER FRAUD.
Just an announcement that we will be pushing for a mandatory minimum jail term of 10 years will scare some of them away
I'm seriously worried. If Republican DC swamptings don't get their act together and start passing legislation that benefits others besides their paymasters, they'll lose both majorities. If that happens, I fear a crisis where already raw emotions get out of hand.
But, please, if they ever again ask me to vote for the "lesser of two evils'? There is no lesser in these two evils....backstabbing Republicans vs Dems.
Tina Smith (Minnesota)
We need to elect Senators that side with the citizens and the rule of law.
We currently have just 4.
It would certainly be nice never to see those names in the news again.
Lessor of two evils will be the choice, and from the list, I really do not see a Democrat that is vulnerable. Incumbency is that big of edge.
Casey should lose, but it will depend on folks showing up... Of year election low turnouts.. he may get himself another term. Get the MAGA voters in PA engaged, he’ll get tossed, but not sure if they are going to make that happen....
Dems are motivated, R’s and I’s that have left wing insanity, have to show up... there are a LOT of Trump D’s in PA, if they aren’t given an argument to not vote for Casey, they likely will.
Corker, Hatch and Flake are quitting, the only Amnesty Senator up for re-election this time is Heller and if he is not Cantorized in the primary he will probably lose the general.
UT is replacing Hatch with Romney.
AZ is being setup to elect McSallycain.
The only place we stand to gain is TN.
While Wicker did not vote for amnesty he is Bush League Republican and should be replaced with a conservative.
Why? The fake majority will just be bumped up to 62 votes, then 66, 68.
Legislative voting is a game, not a number. Lucy will just yank the football.
The Indians are pretty reliable Democratic voters.
Words can’t express how much I wish to see Tammy Baldwin (the gay senator) from Wisconsin defeated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.