Dems: House GOP interviewing 'confidential informant' over Uranium One

CNN ^ | Updated 5:07 PM ET, Tue February 6, 2018 | Eli Watkins

[FreeReign]

Washington (CNN)House Democrats sounded the alarm Tuesday about their Republican counterparts planning to interview a "confidential informant" for the Uranium One probe.

A letter from Reps. Elijah Cummings and Adam Schiff, the top Democrats on the House Oversight and Intelligence committees, respectively, to the GOP chairmen of those committees said Republicans have been in contact with the informant for months without allowing Democrats access.

The Democratic pair further said the Justice Department has already expressed to members of the committees that they had "serious credibility concerns" with the informant, and the two requested Democrats receive a transcript of the expected interview this week.

[FreeReign]

Hannity just confirmed this.

[Mr. K]

Make sure he is under a witness protection program.

[calljack]

“serious credibility concerns”

Oh, you must be talking about Carter Page then.

[Mr. K]

I hope he has life insurance paid up.

I also think he should write down everything he knows AND get it sworn NOW- while he still can, and leave copies to be release if anything happens to him.

I am NOT joking.

[canuck_conservative]

“serious credibility concerns” = anyone with damaging info on the Clintons

[LibFreeUSA]

"Justice Department has already expressed to members of the committees that they had "serious credibility concerns" with the informant...

Would that be the same Justice Department that thought that gave all of that "credibility" to Christopher Steele and his Russian sources?

[Col Frank Slade]

Schiff should issue a Uranium 1 memo.

[circlecity]

"The Democratic pair further said the Justice Department has already expressed to members of the committees that they had "serious credibility concerns" with the informant"

So, he's credible enough to use as an informant, and possibly use to get a warrant, but when he's finished and talks about his experience he has "serious credibility concerns".

[Alberta's Child]

... Justice Department has already expressed to members of the committees that they had "serious credibility concerns" with the informant ...

Is the informant named James Comey?

[sissyjane]

This is Victoria Toensings Client

[Hotlanta Mike]

Hannity just confirmed this.

---

Sara Carter coming up in the 4:00 hour (Eastern time) to discuss more about Campbell testifying...tick tock.

[V K Lee]

Freepers have not forgotten this individual. Many here have asked, in print, what had happened to him. Hopefully they will see this post and find at this moment he is O.K. and is now with the GOPe spilling his guts as to what he knows.

[freepersup]

Guessing it’s William Campbell

https://www.google.com/amp/thehill.com/homenews/administration/361276-fbi-informant-gathered-years-of-evidence-on-russian-push-for-us%3famp#ampshare=http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/361276-fbi-informant-gathered-years-of-evidence-on-russian-push-for-us

[madison10]

Cloven-Piven the Democrats in Congress, FBI, DoJ with their own crimes and evil.

[VRWCarea51]

Right on Q

Q mentioned this yesterday.

[VRWCarea51]

Huma is gonna need to pick up another case of Gin for Hillary.

[VRWCarea51]

Huma is gonna need to pick up another case of Gin for Hillary.

[NEMDF]

This news should be making a few people nervous, I hope. :)

Maybe it’s just a smokescreen to see who commits suicide first? LOL

[Alberta's Child]

What’s interesting is that the credibility of the guy isn’t all that important. If he gives startling testimony and his credibility is in question, then obviously the Congressional committee must see all of the records of the FBI, CIA, NSA, etc. relating to him.

[drypowder]

It’s a no brainer why this witness has been kept from the democrats and it’s not bc they want to challenge his credibility