BREAKING: FBI on The Memo "we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact...

Twitter ^ | 1/31/2018 | Ryan Reilly

[mojito]

BREAKING: FBI on The Memo "we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

[circlecity]

Yet, just yesterday it was reported that the FBI had reviewed the memo and could not find any inaccuracies.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/30/fbi-officials-review-surveillance-memo-could-not-cite-any-factual-inaccuracies-source.html

[Col Frank Slade]

Release it then they can try to pick it apart.

(They’re going to do that anyway)

[TheCornerOffice]

Is there ANY other source for these allegations besides The Hill and HUFFINGTON POST?.

Exactly. And The Hill was quoting a Bloomberg article that cited "sources close to..." type of crap attribution. This is just a new meme intended to look and sound official. Best to wait for a press release from the FBI or something on official FBI letterhead with Wray's signature on it. Otherwise, ignore.

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

ROFL

[Liz]

I see the FBI finally settled on a meme... “The memo doesn’t tell the whole story.”

I'm really surprised the guys didnt decide to use: "it's nobody's business but ours."

That worked out so well for the Clintons.

[Moonman62]

Allow the FBI to write an addendum and release it.

[hal ogen]

Release EVERYTHING then, you seditionist morons.

[Red Badger]

It’s called ‘muddying the Waters’....................put this crap out there, without any attribution, citing ‘anonymous sources’ and the gullible, clueless Dem Base will think it real....................

[bitt]

Interesting that Trey Gowdy is stepping down:

[GIdget2004]

“Yet, just yesterday it was reported that the FBI had reviewed the memo and could not find any inaccuracies.”

And today they say it has material omissions of facts. Those are two separate things, and both could be true.

[deweyfrank]

Who is the person in the FBI who authored this statement?

[MNDude]

They are not supposed to know what is in it.

[Presbyterian Reporter]

Ryan Reilly is a Huffington Post dude.

“we have grave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo’s accuracy.”

Sure looks like Reilly’s sources are Strzok and Page.

[LambSlave]

Didn’t they just say yesterday that there were no inaccuracies in the memo?

This isn't inconsistent. There are no factual inaccuracies in the memo, but now they are saying that the omission of other facts lead to misleading conclusions. Bill came in my house and dumped 15 gallons of water on my desk and destroyed my computer is factually correct, but if I don't tell you it was on fire, you may reach different conclusions about Bill's actions.

[Genoa]

Omissions are to be expected. And many at the FBI would probably like to see something other than what is there. If what is stated is factual, I’m satisfied.

[dead]

Sources tell me that the reporter’s unnamed source for this story is Peter Strzok.

[savedbygrace]

Whoever said it chose to be anonymous because the official FBI response is that the memo is good to go.

[mojito]

Is there ANY other source for these allegations besides The Hill and HUFFINGTON POST?

Not that I'm aware of. It's even unclear if this is an actual FBI public statement. You'd think with something this grave that Wray would clear it with the WH and call a press conference. If this is real, Trump will go ballistic.

[Revel]

Well I think I will trust Fox News over the lefties. If this even has a source within the FBI then it could be coming from any number of Obama insiders.

[Vermont Lt]

I would imagine they would not like it.

Either being duped into acting stupidly, or being so stupid as to act stupidly, or—and this worse—acting with a full knowledge of something being inaccurate—None of these are a good place for the FBI to be.