1. Anyone who believes this somehow protects us against China is stupid.
2. Anyone who proposes it somehow protects us against China is evil, with another agenda.
3. Whomever made the proposal must be fired immediately. Today.
1 posted on
01/28/2018 5:07:10 PM PST by
Mariner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
To: Mariner
Or to guard against a Deep State blackout.
To: Mariner
Can anyone imagine the Government not completely screwing this up?
To: Mariner
Wouldn’t this develop into central control and allow control of all phases and access, such as China now does to its own citizens?
5 posted on
01/28/2018 5:10:28 PM PST by
Yulee
To: Mariner
Fake news...no nationalizing...wrong party.
6 posted on
01/28/2018 5:10:31 PM PST by
CincyRichieRich
(Hurtling deplorable! V.S.G. full steam ahead MAGA!!!)
To: Mariner
AT first glance I like it. It’s limited in scope, it’s a national infrastructure and its the perfect answer to the potential of corporate censorship.
7 posted on
01/28/2018 5:11:45 PM PST by
Fhios
(1987 - Where's Waldo. 2017 - Where's Jeff Sessions?)
To: Mariner
This needs a f’n Drudge siren.
8 posted on
01/28/2018 5:11:55 PM PST by
txhurl
(Banana Republicans, as far as the eye can see)
To: Mariner
Firstnet *IS* this.
this is a nothing burger. Google firstnet.
9 posted on
01/28/2018 5:12:14 PM PST by
Blueflag
(Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
To: Mariner
China has more tentacles in our government than Obama and Hillary combined.
To: Mariner
Oh noes 😱😱😱😱😱😱
11 posted on
01/28/2018 5:13:03 PM PST by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Mariner
A source familiar with the documents' drafting says Option 2 is really no option at all: a single centralized network is what's required to protect America against China and other bad actors.Yeah, let's put all of our battleships in one line at Pearl Harbor, for protection!
Let's put all of our investments into one and only one company, for protection!
Let's have one and only one system, instead of several, so that someone (China or not) will only need to make one successful intrusion instead of several... for protection!!
Idiots.
12 posted on
01/28/2018 5:16:51 PM PST by
Teacher317
(We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
To: Mariner
The article says that they are considering it. Although the writer wants you to believe this action is imminent, it only means that they are doing their job of looking at all of the angles before making a decision. It doesnt mean that theyll actually do this.
To: Mariner
The government comes up with all sorts of wackadoodle ideas that never see the light of day...
Look a squirrel
15 posted on
01/28/2018 5:17:45 PM PST by
Popman
(My sin was great, Your love was greater What could separate us now…)
To: Mariner
Or it just could be Fake News.
20 posted on
01/28/2018 5:22:32 PM PST by
tiki
To: Mariner
Q mentiined fake mewsb China and powerpoint....too funny
22 posted on
01/28/2018 5:23:34 PM PST by
stockpirate
(TYRANNY IS THY NAME REBELLION IS OUR ANSWER. HANG THEM ALL!)
To: Mariner
We need a system redundant in many characteristics if it hopes to survive.
Bell Labs did a really good job of making their land line system robust (but not through redundancy). The current Cell Phone system is not nearly as good in the reliability metrics as a land line.
Let the peeps experiment on new systems with a goal of high reliability of communication.
25 posted on
01/28/2018 5:27:34 PM PST by
Paladin2
To: Mariner
Public Safety has had a monopolistic nationwide construct known as FirstNet foisted upon it. It is exclusively through AT&T. Many are predicting a dismal failure. This 5G Initiative sounds similar.
26 posted on
01/28/2018 5:32:20 PM PST by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: Mariner
Some staffers wet dream, or total fake news.
28 posted on
01/28/2018 5:34:11 PM PST by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust Sessions. The Great Awakening is at hand...MAGA!)
To: Mariner
Honest to -—, is there anything the Left isn’t charging Trump with?
30 posted on
01/28/2018 5:34:51 PM PST by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
To: Mariner
32 posted on
01/28/2018 5:36:59 PM PST by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: Mariner
I’m thinking Fake News here. Last time I looked, they not only didn’t have 5G standards, they didn’t even have a 5G model, with some pushing for wider bandwidth on the current model, and others pushing for microcells.
36 posted on
01/28/2018 5:42:24 PM PST by
PAR35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson