Posted on 01/19/2018 1:13:55 PM PST by mdittmar
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Facebook Inc will change the ranking of its News Feed to give priority to trustworthy news sources above those that its users do not consider trustworthy, Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said on Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Yes, only liberal lying MSM sources will be considered “trustworthy” for Zuckerberg.
Let me guess.
The Washington Post, the New York Times and CNN.
Another reason why I do not let Facebook use me.
Zuckerberg learned a ton working with the Chinese Communist Party
Cuck and Mao - BFF
I don’t use Facebook, so may have some basic ignorance, but.......
Why does Facebook have a news feed in the first place? Wasn’t Facebook supposed to be a site where people’s vanity shines, and they keep up with family and friends and what’s going on in their lives? How does news enter into it? How is it that Facebook is somehow a news source or news site?
Or look at another way, if you want to know what CNN says, won’t you watch CNN or go to their site? Why the need for Facebook to decide that you should get CNN on the Facebook site??
Again, pardon my ignorance if I completely misunderstand Facebook.
Because “clicks” = dollars.
Not on Facebook,waste of time.
Facebook is a cryptic marketing tool that collects data on its many users and sells it for cash. That’s why it is difficult, if not impossible, to go completely “dark” to its interests.
And with a typical limousine liberal at the helm. And people dump their personal info into this machine despite the red flags.
Social media site owners now going the way same as China control.....Xi is very busy influencing these boys.
Censorship of conservatism.
Just asking. . . .
A perfect data-collecting tool for the Antichrist (eventually) IMHO.
Frankly, cell phones too. Which I have but I refuse to FakeBook.
Another reason I have never been on facebook.
Another issue is that liberals don’t “fact-check” lies told by liberals.
Whos Checking the Fact Checkers?
A new study sheds some light on what facts the press most likes to check.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/peter-roff/2013/05/28/study-finds-fact-checkers-biased-against-republicans
They definitely cover for one another.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.