Posted on 01/09/2018 10:26:23 AM PST by Red Badger
Thanks, DiFi.
you are playing right into our hands. and to think you’ve been a swamp creature for DECADES, you couldn’t see this move as doing exactly what conservatives want.
you’ve done yourself and your party a grave disservice, for which I am grateful.
Thanks. Those declined questions will be interesting to read.
whose
Why did she do that? It makes her look stupid. The bull crap is still bull crap and no one says different.
see #77
Lawyer: ‘Someone’s already been killed’ as a result of the Trump dossier
Page 279 of the testimony.
MR. FOSTER: So without getting into naming
15 the sources or anything like that, what steps did
16 you take to try to verify their credibility?
17 MR. SIMPSON: I’m going to decline to answer
18 that.
19 MR. FOSTER: Why?
20 MR. LEVY: It’s a voluntary interview, and in
21 addition to that he wants to be very careful to
22 protect his sources. Somebody’s already been
23 killed as a result of the publication of this
24 dossier and no harm should come to anybody related
25 to this honest work.
see above
Prince Andrew of the House of Cuomo is having apoplexy at losing all hope of the nomination!
Well, there IS a difference. The release has her name on it; a leak is done surreptitiously.
According to TR page 10, lines through 17 states " [Counsel Davis]: Finally, we ask that you not speak to anyone about what we discuss in this interview with anyone else outside of who's here in the room today in order to preserve the integrity of our investigation ." (emphasis added)
And there you have the real reason Feinswine released the transcript - now everybody else question can recite the same lies.
From Chris Muir's Day By Day cartoon...
So far (through page 40): The name of Fusion GPS's bank and the names of their employees. That's about it. To answer your question, no not heavily redacted.
From the first part I've read, Simpson makes a very good witness, answers questions skillfully, yet doesn't come across as being evasive or misleading. Its not full of "I don't recalls", either.
Uh huh, “redacted.”
IOW, not to be trusted.
I believe there was likely plenty of cross examination at the time, and under oath.
Since that closed door interview (Simpson), Nunes has now the records in his hands.
A legal wrangle was probable in any event and accelerating that wrangle rather suits me. Let’s not forget the R’s work the calendar the same way as Democrats, with regard to the next election (this time the mid-term elections) so, it stands to reason the R’s can drag things out to their advantage, but not necessarily ours.
yah, I pinged everyone to 77 after that.. my brain’s getting fouled with all that’s going on...
Could the somebodys already been killed person be Seth Rich?
if it turns out that it WAS Seth Rich, Diane the Fink-stein’s gonna have a lot of ‘splainin to do...to the dems -
she’d be our hero for exposing it...
BREAKING: House Chairman Asks Paul Ryan To Declassify All DOJ And FBI Trump Dossier Docs
Daily Caller | 1/9/2018 | Richard Pollack
Posted on 01/09/2018 4:05:47 PM PST by mojito
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3620979/posts
Thanks for the link.....very interesting in some ways and it is very evident why Swinestein released it
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.