Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis…

The Conservative Treehouse ^ | 1/5/18 | Sundance

[randita]

Operation Condor – How NSA Director Mike Rogers Saved The U.S. From a Massive Constitutional Crisis…

Posted on January 5, 2018 by sundance This outline is the stunning backstory to how the FBI Counterintelligence Division and DOJ National Security Division were weaponized. This outline is the full story of what House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes is currently working to expose. This outline exposes the biggest political scandal in U.S. history. This outline is also the story of how one man’s action likely saved our constitutional republic.

His name is Admiral Mike Rogers.

I’m calling the back-story to the 2016 FISA 702(16)(17) political corruption by the Obama administration “Operation Condor”. Those of you familiar with the film “Three Days of The Condor” will note how the real life storyline almost mirrors the Hollywood film. For the real life version, NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers plays the role of “Condor”.

“SCIF” – a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility. To understand the larger FISA 702(16)(17) issues in 2016 it is important to focus on the word “compartmented”.

Intelligence information is housed by compartments. Each intelligence unit holds intelligence unique to that compartment. The FBI Counter-Intelligence Unit would hold the intelligence information specific to their task or assignment; the DOJ National Security Division would hold their own compartmented intelligence; again, specific to their task and objectives. So too would the DOJ, DoD (Pentagon), State Dept., or CIA.

This compartmented structure is what led to the creation of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, ODNI. The 911 commission recommended the office to serve as a hub able to ensure intelligence sharing; that is – to ensure intelligence was not intentionally withheld from other compartments when needed.

In 2016 the ODNI for President Obama was James Clapper.

[Pelham]

“IG Horowitz’s “review” doesn’t cover this topic. Only the Clinton email investigation.”

An assertion indicating that you have no idea what you are talking about. Read and learn:

https://oig.justice.gov/press/2017/2017-01-12.pdf

[Boomer]

Thanks. Well done article. Shared it with everyone.

[RightField]

Bookmark

[Pelham]

He could have interested parties telling him where to look for some publicly available dots. But if that’s the case it still takes skill to understand and connect them.

Something like that is why insurance salesman Tom Clancy was able to crank out a remarkably detailed book like Red October. Some of his Annapolis area clients told him of obscure articles he might find interesting.

[FreeReign]

An assertion indicating that you have no idea what you are talking about. Read and learn

RTFL. As I said, IG Horowitz’s “review” doesn’t cover this topic. Only the Clinton email investigation.

[FreeReign]

READ!

(excerpt)

...the review will examine the following issues:

• Allegations that Department or FBI policies or procedures were not followed in connection with, or in actions leading up to or related to, the FBI Director’s public announcement on July 5, 2016, and the Director’s letters to Congress on October 28 and November 6, 2016, and that certain underlying investigative decisions were based on improper considerations;

• Allegations that the FBI Deputy Director should have been recused from participating in certain investigative matters;

• Allegations that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters;

• Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information; and

• Allegations that decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents on October 30 and November 1, 2016, and the use of a Twitter account to publicize same, were influenced by improper considerations.

[Pelham]

Elise Stefanik politely dismantled Comey. A very talented interrogator.

The most impressive Congressman from NY state since Sam Stratton.

[TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig]

I agree...

[Steve Van Doorn]

Mike Rogers retiring. That is a twist I didn’t expect.

[Pelham]

Well that’s good of you to post the OIG release that I linked to. Perhaps that will make it easier for you to notice that:

• Allegations that the Department’s Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs improperly disclosed non-public information to the Clinton campaign and/or should have been recused from participating in certain matters;

• Allegations that Department and FBI employees improperly disclosed non-public information;

are addressing topics other than Hillary’s email server. See if you can guess what the OIG is looking at. The hint is Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Bruce Ohr, Nellie Ohr.

[justa-hairyape]

Wow. Unredacted documents too.

[FreeReign]

It's. About. The. Email. Investigation.

It has nothing to do with the illegal surveillance of Trump.

You have no idea what you are talking about. Read and learn:

January 12, 2017 Fox News

(excerpt)

The Department of Justice inspector general announced a sweeping review Thursday of Justice Department and FBI actions leading up to the November election – in response to criticism from both sides of the aisle over how the agencies handled the Hillary Clinton email scandal.

The decision breathes new life into a controversy that had been fading since Clinton lost to Donald Trump.

The IG's office said the review will focus on allegations that procedures were not followed in connection to FBI Director James Comey’s announcement on July 5 that he would not recommend charges, even though Clinton and her staff acted “extremely carelessly” in using private email when she served as secretary of state.

The review also will look at whether appropriate policy and procedures were followed in Comey’s surprise letter to Congress on Oct. 28 – which announced he was revisiting the email probe in light of newly discovered emails – and a letter on Nov. 6, which announced there would be no further charges. Members of the Clinton campaign and its allies have said Comey's decision to announce the reopening of the probe damaged Clinton's bid and helped cost her the election.

Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced the review in response “to requests from numerous Chairmen and Ranking Members of Congressional oversight committees, various organizations, and members of the public.”

The probe will also examine allegations that FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe should have been recused from the probe. Questions were raised about McCabe’s impartiality after it was revealed Clinton ally and Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe donated to his wife’s 2015 Senate campaign.

Additionally, the probe will investigate allegations that DOJ and FBI employees improperly disclosed information not meant for the public. This apparently refers to assistant attorney general Peter Kadzik, whose email tipping off Clinton Campaign Chair John Podesta about a House oversight committee hearing was revealed by WikiLeaks.

The review will also probe decisions regarding the timing of the FBI’s release of certain Freedom of Information Act documents at the end of October.

The FBI’s Records Vault released a number of documents on Oct. 30 and Nov. 1, including the investigation into retired Gen. David Petraeus for compromising classified material, and the probe into President Bill Clinton’s controversial 2001 pardon of financier Marc Rich. The timing led some to believe it was an attempt to influence the election.

Inspector general to review DOJ, FBI handling of Clinton case

[a little elbow grease]

"Obviously, based on what we have learned since March 2017, and what has surfaced recently, we can all see why the FBI would want to keep it hidden that they were running a counterintelligence operation against a presidential candidate. After all, as FBI Agent Peter Strzok said it in his text messages, it was an “insurance policy”."

________

Rep. Elise Stefanik questioning of Comey at hearing was electric.

[Pelham]

"It's. About. The. Email. Investigation. It has nothing to do with the illegal surveillance of Trump."

"In February, the then-chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), and the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), asked Horowitz to look into leaks of classified intelligence intercepts about National Security Adviser Michael Flynn."

"House Oversight Chairman Jason Chaffetz requested Wednesday that the Department of Justice launch an investigation into the leaks surrounding the ouster of Michael Flynn.

"In a letter addressed to inspector general Michael Horowitz released Wednesday, Chaffetz expressed concern over "potentially classified national security information" circulated in recent news reports leading up to the resignation of the former national security adviser."

Hunh. Chaffetz and Goodlatte requesting OIG Horowitz investigate intelligence intercepts that led to the Flynn resignation. Imagine that. I guess that must be part of "Hillary emails". Or not. snort.

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/07/25/michael-horowitz-inspector-general-russia-election-testimony-240944

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/chaffetz-leaks-michael-flynn-235079

[a little elbow grease]

ValJar assigned codenames to those being wiretapped in the daily PDBs which the 32 authorized readers then disseminated. Once they realized their jig was up, all the PDBs were reeled in and classified by ValJar in zero’s ‘library’.

_____________

Lordy!

[a little elbow grease]

“spying on Trump made it into the pdb’s???” !!!!!

_____________

OBOZO was in the loop......

[a little elbow grease]

Using the intelligence agencies of the US to rig the election for Hillary is bigger than Watergate.----- much, much bigger.

But not nearly as big as the Kenyanesian Usurpation.----- Making him President was unreal and treasonous.

BOTH parties colluded to violate the Constitution. ----- yes.

[a little elbow grease]

Uh, oh! you dare to critique the faultless and brilliant former grocery store manager mark bradman aka sundance? You are asking for flam8ng from those who live and breathe and hang onto his every word, regardless of how speculative and inaccurate it might be. But I guess your correction to his article will, unlike posting at Conservative Treehouse, still allow you to stay on FR. Over at CTH any dissent, however, intelligent, is cause for immediate banning. Only the Cult of Sundance is allowed at CTH.

_______

....... Save it. Do you still beat your dog?

[a little elbow grease]

I remember watching it live. The girl was great and Comey was sweatin’ and uncomfortable in his seat.

[a little elbow grease]

Farkas is the one who let slip what was happening.

___________

Yes. What a "full of herself" jerk she was.