Bump for later. I’m not making myself clear.
Your clarity isn’t the problem here. It is your support of Mueller and his role.
1) First you say the Mueller thing doesn’t implicate the Constitution. You should know better than that, but that tells me you probably don’t understand how the Constitution is the only authority for the feds to do anything.
2) Then you’ve got a problem finding where the Constitution authorizes a special prosecutor appointed by the President, where the Constitution expressly states that Congress has the SOLE power to impeach.
3) The lack of reasonable suspicion or probable cause, and the presence of conflict of interest - that all comes later but become moot becsue you can’t overcome those first two things.