Norm didn’t just sit idly by in that election. The case went all the way to the Minnesota supreme Court. I don’t see how you say Norm stood by and let Franken steal the election when it went through the courts, with the election not decided for months. What am I missing?
I'm seeing this history revisionism that "Coleman sat by and did nothing while Franken stole the election" repeated on FR a lot lately.
The truth, of course, is that Franken didn't manage to get the stolen seat until July 7 because Coleman had been fighting tooth and nail since November to contest Franken's phony 312 vote margin "win" in his third recount. Numerous "conservatives" here refused to lift a finger to help him and said Coleman "deserved to lose" because he was a "RINO"
Perhaps we should resurrect some threads from 2008, given how many are trying to rewrite history.