Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second U.S. judge halts Trump's proposed transgender military ban
NBC "News" ^ | November 22, 2017 | AP

Posted on 11/22/2017 6:53:37 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer

BALTIMORE — Another federal judge has halted a proposed transgender military ban, expanding on an initial ruling issued last month against the plan by President Donald Trump's administration.

In a preliminary injunction issued Tuesday in Baltimore, U.S. District Judge Marvin Garbis ruled that transgender service members have "demonstrated that they are already suffering harmful consequences" due to the proposed ban including threat of discharge, stigma and the cancellation or delay of surgeries related to their gender transitions. The six plaintiffs in the lawsuit he reviewed have all been receiving hormone therapy.

In a strongly-worded passage from his 53-page decision, Garbis wrote that the "capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified tweet of new policy does not trump the methodical and systematic review by military stakeholders qualified to understand the ramifications of policy change."

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: freakshow; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2017 6:53:37 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The courts have no enforcement authority over a co equal branch of the government. Its time for a President with backbone to tell them that and then implement policies that help rebuild America.


2 posted on 11/22/2017 6:55:16 AM PST by Uncle Sam 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

In a strongly-worded passage from his 53-page decision, Garbis wrote that the “capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified tweet of new policy does not trump the methodical and systematic review by military stakeholders qualified to understand the ramifications of policy change.”


Wow. He’s totally unhinged and foaming at the mouth in hatred for POTUS.


3 posted on 11/22/2017 6:57:08 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
"capricious, arbitrary, and unqualified tweet of new policy does not trump the methodical and systematic review by military stakeholders qualified to understand the ramifications of policy change."

i.e., Obama, two years ago.

LOL!!!

4 posted on 11/22/2017 6:58:15 AM PST by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Transgenders are crazy. Don’t need crazy people in the military.


5 posted on 11/22/2017 6:58:53 AM PST by bk1000 (I stand with Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

so judges should obey rules made by committee and not their own decisions?

Trump is commander in chief, his decisions are final.

Those studies the judge refers were 100% political and not in any way based on reality.


6 posted on 11/22/2017 6:59:35 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Sam 911

Rebuilding the military is the first order of the day and it is up to the Commander in Chief. All the black-robed piss ants on the bench have diddley-squat to do with this process. At this point, I can’t see how military courts or even sharia courts would be superior to the current system of justice.


7 posted on 11/22/2017 7:00:13 AM PST by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

How can these judges be removed from the bench for exceeding their authority?


8 posted on 11/22/2017 7:01:10 AM PST by Mr. K (NO CONSEQUENCE OF OBAMACARE REPEAL IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

How dare you doubt the critical strategic and tactical benefits of adding sexual deviants to our military’s ranks?!


9 posted on 11/22/2017 7:01:11 AM PST by ConservativeWarrior (Fall down 7 times, stand up 8. - Japanese proverb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

The president is the commander in chief....not some never elected judge in a position not even mentioned in the constitution.


10 posted on 11/22/2017 7:02:44 AM PST by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Actually this is a good thing. Trump can now appeal and work this through the courts to get some precedent at the highest levels. The Establishment crowd always backs down thus giving the left what they want and never establishing any good case law on our side. Keep it up President Trump - hold fast.


11 posted on 11/22/2017 7:04:29 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

All further proof that Trump needs his nominees confirmed pronto.


12 posted on 11/22/2017 7:06:00 AM PST by FlipWilson (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Maybe it’s time for sane minds to rule on this. Look at the facts, understanding what is at stake, the let the SCOTUS hopefully tell us there are only two genders.

No gender fluid nonsense. A person is either born male or female; nothing else unless they are a hermaphrodite which is extremely rare. Changing the outside appearance of a female does not make that person a male. Ever. Regardless of the change of clothes, implants, or snip surgery.

Any belief by a person otherwise must therefor be in their head which means it’s a mental issue requiring help. By admitting mental patients into the military the military is accepting responsibility for all mental health the patient receives for life. Wrong answer.

Since when is it the taxpayers responsibility to pay for these mental health patients for life when previously the military would reject mental patients for good cause. Who wants a nut case in the foxhole with them in a time of huge stress. No one does of course.

The military is not the place for social experiments.


13 posted on 11/22/2017 7:08:22 AM PST by Boomer (TisOK2BWhite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Are we really headed for open revolt? The judiciary in this country has claimed unconstitutional powers and not one elected official lifts a finger to stop it.

President Trump should tell all these judges to pound sand. Someone has to defy them and get the ball rolling. Then others will join in.

Consider the "sexual harassment" tidal wave. The Harvey Weinstein affair got the ball rolling, and now it has blossomed out of control.

Would that the same thing will happen against the tyrants in black robes.
 

14 posted on 11/22/2017 7:10:05 AM PST by Governor Dinwiddie (Happy Thanksgiving!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Obama’s ,”Be all you can be” ,after your Free sex change


15 posted on 11/22/2017 7:11:21 AM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Why isn’t the congress starting impeachment against this judge?


16 posted on 11/22/2017 7:11:50 AM PST by Colo9250 (Time for a new Attorney General!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Colo9250

Because “McConnell”.


17 posted on 11/22/2017 7:15:22 AM PST by House Atreides (BOYCOTT the NFL, its products and players 100% - PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: circlecity

Trump needs to move forward with implementing his policy while it percolates up to the Supremes. Then slow walk it all the way up.


18 posted on 11/22/2017 7:17:15 AM PST by SgtHooper (If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins

The CiC should cite a pressing need for military personnel, issue a three person draft and put these three judges into a uniform and send them to Afghanistan.


19 posted on 11/22/2017 7:21:57 AM PST by Mouton (The MSM is a clear and present danger to the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

Judges are lawyers. Lawyers are mostly Democrats. I’ll give odds that these judges have gay children or siblings, or are gay themselves, openly or closeted. Whatever the cause(es), their actions deserve removal from the bench.


20 posted on 11/22/2017 7:23:06 AM PST by polymuser (Its terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged today. - Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson