Posted on 11/19/2017 12:10:49 PM PST by doug from upland
Following The Gateway Pundits viral story on Judge Roy Moores alleged signature inside accuser Beverly Young Nelsons yearbook, more evidence suggested it was a forgery.
The signature says To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, Merry Christmas. Love, Roy Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House.
Strangely, To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, Merry Christmas. Love, Roy, is written in black ink, while Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House, is in blue ink.
And then theres this Judge Roy Moore was not the DA in 1978. He would not have signed a signature with DA after it. Moore insists this is not his signature.
The Moore campaign is demanding Gloria Allred turn over the fraudulent signature in the yearbook for analysis.
Now there are calls for the arrest of far left Attorney Gloria Allred.
Market Ticker reported:
Jesus, its that obvious and CNN ran this crap?
People need to go to ****ing prison for this. NOW.
Yes, including Gloria Allred. The yearbook is an obvious forgery and she peddled it on national television; that needs to be good for disbarment and prosecution.
And Beverly Nelsons stepson Darrel Nelson also called for the arrest of Gloria Allred.
Darrel Nelson called for Alabama to arrest Gloria Allred in a text message to The Gateway Pundit on Sunday.
Alabama needs to call for the arrest of Gloria Allred for election tampering and fraud. And more importantly for pissing us off.
Allred was a Hillary delegate at the DNC in 2016.
Allred is also under TWO INVESTIGATIONS for misconduct as an attorney.
Its time to hold Gloria Alled accountable for pushing this fraudulent document for political gain.
Wolf Blitzer Repeatedly Asks Gloria Allred if the Yearbook Signature is a Forgery ALLRED REFUSES TO ANSWER! (VIDEO)
Who the hell dates a yearbook signature??? I have a lot of signatures in my two high school yearbooks, and a lot in my two Navy yearbooks, and not one of them has a date by the signer.
Moore specifically pointed to the initials D.A. that appear after the signature on the yearbook to further demonstrate that the yearbook inscription and signature represent what he described as a forgery and complete fabrication.
Moore was speaking in an interview for this reporters weekend talk radio show, Aaron Klein Investigative Radio, broadcast on New Yorks AM 970 The Answer and NewsTalk 990 AM. The interview will air in full on Sunday night.
At a press conference earlier this week with Allred, accuser Beverly Young Nelson claimed that she originally met Moore when he was a 30-year-old deputy district attorney in Etowah County and would regularly eat at a restaurant in Gadsden called Olde Hickory House. Moore has denied knowing Nelson.
Nelson claims that Moore signed her yearbook in 1977 sometime just before Christmas.
At a press conference in New York, Allred presented a photocopy of the yearbook with an inscription that reads: To a sweeter more beautiful girl I could not say, Merry Christmas. Love, Roy Moore DA, 12-22-77, Olde Hickory House.
In our interview, Moore spotlighted the initials D.A., linking it to a signature on Nelsons 1999 divorce document over two decades later. That signature was followed by the initials of his former assistant, Delbra Adams, who only started working for him in 1987.
At the press conference with Allred, Nelson failed to mention the divorce case entirely and that Moore was the judge whose stamped signature appears on her 1999 divorce document. And alongside Moores signature are the initials D.A. for Delbra Adams, Roy Moores former longtime secretary and judicial assistant.
Breitbart News caught up with Adams yesterday, and she confirmed in an interview that the initials on Nelsons divorce document were indeed hers. Adams explained it is normal procedure for a clerk or assistant to initial a stamped signature on a legal document to verify that the stamp is authentic.
In their press statement they said that this Nelson woman had no contact with me since 1977, Moore said in our radio interview. But in actuality, we found that she had a divorce case. I signed the document. My secretary stamped the document and then put her initials out on the end of the line.
Moore continued: When they forged the name onto this manual, they also included the initials of my receptionist, my secretary. Which were D.A. Delbra Adams. And certainly they forged it and this is a complete fabrication. I did not know Nelson and had never met her and still do not know her.
Allred and Nelson have claimed that the D.A. at the end of the yearbook signature stand for district attorney even though at the time Moore was a deputy district attorney.
On Wednesday, an attorney for Moore sent an official letter giving Allred forty-eight hours to release the yearbook to an independent examiner and to take steps to ensure the immediate and professional preservation of the yearbook.
Allred has done a series of news media interviews in which she has made clear her refusal to release the yearbook to any entity other than a Senate committee. This even though Moore is not yet a senator, so such an ethics committee cannot be formed. And despite the yearbook inscription playing a central role in the campaign for a U.S. senate seat.
Allred has further admitted that she had not asked Nelson whether she actually saw Moore sign her yearbook.
Following Allreds press conference, Breitbart News contacted four signature and handwriting authentication experts certified by the American Society of Questioned Document Examiners. Each of the four independently arrived at the same conclusion, saying they would need the original yearbook inscription to definitively draw conclusions.
Handwriting expert Linda L Mitchell told Breitbart News that an absolute identification is very difficult without the original document because photographs and photocopies do not provide a three-dimensional view of handwriting, which would include pressure and line quality.
Those things are important if a definitive opinion is to be reached. Anything less than that would not provide enough support for a definitive opinion unless the handwriting contains highly identifiable peculiarities.
The three other experts echoed Mitchells sentiments.
In the interview, meanwhile, Moore said the accusations against him are part of a campaign to distract from the agenda that the American public wants enacted:
They did everything in the world to attack the Foundation for Moral Law, which my wife works for and which I once worked for. And to attack my character over my salary and everything else. The last attempt was this 30 days before the election. They brought up matters supposedly of a sexual impropriety which never happened, never would have happened, and never would have been brought up but to detract this campaign from arguing the issues which finally affect our country.
So what Im saying is this is just an attempt to stop a campaign.They cant win. They didnt win and its a culmination of not only the Democrats but also the Republican establishment who are behind it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4769772/Gloria-Allred-two-bar-investigations.html
You should see Kilmeade on Faux and Friends. That guy is such a GOP-e douche canoe that watching him is unbearable. He was the same way to Trump during his campaign but changed his demeanor after Trump won (i.e. he is a limp wristed chameleon).
Prison?
She needs to be drug behind a pickup until there is just goo
An example needs to be made to deter others
Lock her UP!
Great Limerick!
(Lock all red up!)
Presenting false documentary evidence to impugn the character of another is criminal fraud and in most states criminal libel. It is called “uttering a false document” in old English law. The act and its intent prove malice as well, and can support a criminal prosecution and a civil case. (Presenting false documents in court is a ground for disbarment.)
I would go full bore on Alred if I were Moore.Since its interstate fraud, she also may be charged under the RICO statute. Alred is indeed a racketeer.
Some photos of the yearbook inscription I’ve seen are in black and white. Is that how it was originally presented to hide the multi-colored inks?
...Still not there yet. No proof as to who did it, and it has not been presented in such a way as to create or attempt to create a tangible benefit to the presenter...
I disagree, enough probable cause (fair probability) exists for seizure of the yearbook as evidence of a crime...of course it has been presented as tangible benefit to the presenter also they said he signed it in the diner thus who could have forged it is under control of the owner...
a demand for retraction was made within 10 days by Moore's attorneys in accordance with defamation statutes for punitive damages so we shall see what happens soon.
“Vindictive or punitive damages shall not be recovered in any action for libel on account of any publication unless (1) it shall be proved that the publication was made by the defendant with knowledge that the matter published was false, or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not, and (2) it shall be proved that five days before the commencement of the action the plaintiff shall have made written demand upon the defendant for a public retraction of the charge or matter published; and the defendant shall have failed or refused to publish within five days, in as prominent and public a place or manner as the charge or matter published occupied, a full and fair retraction of such charge or matter.”
https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/alabama/al-code/alabama_code_6-5-186
In an action of slander or libel, if a retraction as provided in Section 6-5-184 shall be published in such medium within 10 days of the date of the publication, then the plaintiff in such case shall recover only actual damages.
https://www.lawserver.com/law/state/alabama/al-code/alabama_code_6-5-185
Carbon paper?
The handwriting style, however, in my amateur opinion seems to be a decent match for both comment and signature. Capital M match may be suspect: Merry vs Moore
What is the tangible benefit to the presenter?
Possible, even probable intangible benefits, but nothing tangible.
financial gain..do you think she is doing this out of the goodness of her heart?
I mean that they/Nelson used carbon paper to copy the signature from the divorce papers. May be two different colors or carbon paper. It would not be as easy to forge by just looking at the signature, carbon paper would be much easier.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.