Posted on 11/19/2017 10:56:56 AM PST by drewh
Sounds like he knows nothing about Anita Hill.
Matthew Dowd is a Bush Republican.
Everything Bush Republicans do is to advance the Bush Plan for North Mexico (aka USA).
Oh sure, blame the black guy
Flawed reasoning by M.D.
What it's all about, just as it was when Republicans were doing everything in their power to marginalize conservative candidates, is that establishment Republicans would rather be an ineffective minority than to have a Constitutional, conservative government in which States and individuals have the rights guaranteed to them.
Anita Hill testified in 1991.
Bill Clinton’s rape and abuse took place long before that with few exceptions.
DowD DuD Dude.. Oh Plz. Spare me the logic you used to arrive at that one.
The media ,, lost , adrift, clueless,, whatever.. Worthless works best.
Matthew Dowd is a Bush Republican.
... and a Bush Republican is a Democrat. One half of the Bush-Clinton crime family.
Accuse a Democrat: no conviction equals no evidence
Accuse a Republican: it’s the seriousness of the charges
JFK and LBJ, too. Republicans made them to do it.
Well he was a Democrat then a Repub and now a who knows. He is dating Maria Shriver. I say he is a punk for whoever pays him. A paid pin head. A nobody.
You could say Kennedy and Clinton paved the way for TRUMP and Moore voters...Dem voters voted for Kennedy ,who murdered a woman and they voted for Clinton who raped and sexually abused women...Sooooo,as long as you do it in your private life,it’s no problem,according to democrats....
The other excuse would be that was a looooooong time ago...So were the allegations against Moore and TRUMP..Again,whatever DEMS use ,republicans can use to save their candidates...
Lets go farther back to Jack and Ted Kennedy with Chris Dodd.
It was well known what they got away with, its OK because they were progressive/communists.
Rules do not apply to them.
How does MoDo excuse the Quid proc quo Riady cash for the Utah Land Grab?
The most ridiculous part of Dowds analysis was that Justice Thomas 1991 confirmation somehow empowered Clintons alleged rape of Juanita Broaddrick in the mid-1970s. Clinton didnt need to be empowered because he had a long history of preying on women. His comments effectively covered for Clintons sexual assault allegations, so he has no place to stand when he wants to claim to have a moral high ground.
and FDR with Lucy Mercer
and Ike with Kay Summersby
and Harding with Nan Briton,
and, and and...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.