It’s The Guardian. Every other word is a lie, including “and”.
L
Wasn’t it 3% of the population that fought for our freedom in 1776?
The Guardian is just jealous.
Speaking of which, I just got my Turners Outdoorsman 2017 Holiday “Gun Porn” Guide in the mail.
I’ll have send Santa a List. I’ve been a good boy, I Voted for Trump and have TRUMP 45 Vanity License Plates on my Car.
Really feels good to be an American.
We’re the cool kid.
The U.K. is obsessed with covering us.
Guilty!
So its is those very poor people with no roof over their heads that own 40 guns each?
This liberal rag, even by the British standard, is trying to equate high gun ownership with crime, but shoot themselves in the foot when they admit that the high crime rates are found in areas where the residents are unlikely to own more than one gun.
But then most liberals are short on logic.
330,00,000 'mericans.
330,000,000 x .03 = ~ 10,000,000. 133,000,000 / 10,000,000 = 13.3 Including .22LRs, muskets, likely pellet and BB gunz,, muzzle loaders, Antiques, etc. What, exactly, is the point of this article? *************************** Common Sense, Comprehensive Spending Control before Gun Control....
Let’s see... There’s Ted Nugent, Hickok45, and the rest of us.
(Not to mention the Franklin Armory Binary Trigger system I just installed in my AR)
MUAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!!
Propaganda study aimed at minimizing gun ownership in the USA.
Their total only comes from surveys, where people are asked if they own guns.
There total is only 265 million guns in private hands. The actual figure is likely over 400 million.
That indicates they undercounted about 135 million, or that about 1 of three gun owners was unwilling to tell them that they owned guns.
330,00,000 'mericans.
330,000,000 x .03 = ~ 10,000,000.
133,000,000 / 10,000,000 = 13.3
Including .22LRs, muskets, likely pellet and BB gunz,, muzzle loaders, Antiques, etc.
What, exactly, is the point of this article?
***************************
Common Sense, Comprehensive Spending Control before Gun Control....
Does this include bows?
I’m doing my part.....
You could fit almost two Europe’s into the US with room left over. How much gun crime is done there including the muzzies shooting up the place?
Translation.... strict new gun laws will only affect 3% of the population.
At least 10% of the males will no longer admit to gun ownership. Especially in blue states.
Interesting. I don’t recall the “in their homes for self-defense” clause in the 2nd Amendment.
Interesting. I don’t recall the “in their homes for self-defense” clause in the 2nd Amendment.
It talks about the rates of firearm violence being concentrated among very small groups of individuals in 125 large cities. It could have gone a step further and said that it is related to drug and gang activity, but that would have beet un-PC.
It could have calculated the numbers for firearm death per 100 on the basis of those small areas and the rest of the country. When that is done you find US (no gang/drug area) firearm violence rates comparable to the rest of the developed countries that gun control advocates always compare the US to.
There are two US gun control zones, one is like a gang dominated central American country in terms of Gun violence, and the rest of the country is low gun violence similar to many European countries.
Finally, firearm suicides. Yes there are lost (too many) firearm suicides, but a famous study comparing Vancouver BC to Seattle (published in the 1990’s in the New England Journal of Medicine) found that the rates of suicide in both locations were about the same. In fact it concluded that a person who wanted to commit suicide if they didn't have access to a handgun, would probably just choose another method to kill themselves.
Unfortunately, since then suicide by cop has become much more common.