I’ve got to admit, for the first time I wished our First Daughter would STFU.
“No reason to disbelieve...” seems to be the talking point when the fact that multiple women appear simultaneously 40 years after some unprovable events supposedly took place and shortly before an election seems MORE than enough reason for any sensible person to question these stories. I can only assume, therefore, that Ivanka is not a sensible person.
... and it’s not that I’m a Judge Moore supporter, either. I was hugely disappointed by his appearance (by phone) on Hannity. His answers seemed odd and evasive (Hannity later said he had the same reaction, by the way), so I don’t know what the truth is here - but I HATE seeing people destroyed this way, because we’ve seen the left attempt (and sometimes succeed) in this time and time and time again... and yet, these kind of allegations AREN’T TO BE QUESTIONED according to certain so-called Republicans in power. Uh, huh.
She's back working on the Weinstein angle.
Wonder how she's gonna get out of the Beverly Nelson. mess. Allred can't leave it. Moore wouldn't sue...but his wife and family could likely do it easily.
Yes , Ivanka needs to learn when to shut her pie-hole.
“No reason to disbelieve...” ????? Buahahahahahaha!
There’s plenty of reason to disbelieve:
1) forged yearbook signature,
2) never banned from mall
3) all concerned were 17 yoa plus, any dating with parental consent
4) accuser photocopied her divorce court order copy onto her High School yearbook ( Roy Moore D.A. ) a stamp signature by a judicial assistance.
5) accusers silent for 40 years while Moore was a public figure.
6) Alabama robo calls for anyone to step forward to complain about Moore, for a fee.
The Facts, my dear Watson, THE FACTS!
Ivanka needs to be a bit smarter when getting all keyed up by femino-nazis and the GOPe establishment.
Steve Bannon needs a presser with Rush Limbaugh.