Posted on 11/10/2017 6:20:44 PM PST by zeestephen
>>You are a dirtball, there lefty. You got Moore down as a liar. I know what color you are on the inside. Now GTFO or man up and admit it.
***********************************************************
Look in the mirror, POS troll. You’ve been exposed. Take it like a man, even if you aren’t one.
Believe the lying accuser all you want. you are in good company, what with Mitch the Bitch Maconnell and John McKook. You fit right in.
I really don’t get the neo-puritans like you. What’s the problem with dating young firtle age women who are of legal age
—
You don’t know me, so don’t make an attempt to insult me and politically, on a national level, he’s done.
—
How did I insult you? Neo-Puritans are triggered by younger women dating older men, just as you are. I’m assumed that you’re part of that group since you described him as creepy for dating legal younger women. When you use the terms of the particular group and hold the same values as a group, people are going to assume you’re part of a group.
>>Believe the lying accuser all you want. you are in good company, what with Mitch the Bitch Maconnell and John McKook. You fit right in.
********************************************************
I’ve already said Mitch and McTraitor are despicable traitors, and you willfully continue to ignore that, which makes you a either a pathetic troll or just plain ignorant.
In either case, there is little point in continued attempts to get a troll to cease, or to get you to understand, when you just don’t possess the capability.
Bless your heart.
I do not know where I was on that date in 1979. Of course. But if someone brought me to a person’s name, someone I remembered knowing, from any time in my past, and I remembered we were friends, YES, I would at least remember whether we were romantically involved.
If you had a one night dalliance with a girl, you might not remember her. And you wouldn’t remember knowing she was your friend. I’m asking you to recreate what Moore said, that he remembers someone (not in his circle of peers but a child when he was an adult) AS HIS FRIEND. But has “no recollection” of them dating or being involved romantically. I call BS. You would remember whether or not you had those feelings for one of your old friends.
I don’t know why he dissembles or lies on this point. It’s bothersome because it’s a Hillary Clinton style lie. He could have admitted dating the 17 year old -it was no crime.
When you say “romantically involved” do you see a single date where there was no sex involved as “romantically involved?
For my part, I probably went out with and mostly made out with half the eligible girls in my high school at one time or another. Actual intercourse was pretty rare, even in the 70’s but we are talking about that, are we?
Relax, he is not lying.
How did I insult you? Neo-Puritans are triggered by younger women dating older men, just as you are. I�m assumed that you�re part of that group since you described him as creepy for dating legal younger women. When you use the terms of the particular group and hold the same values as a group, people are going to assume you�re part of a.
—
Thank you. Getting a good chuckle from your post as you continue in and attempt to label me, and yes, insult me. Not that I care, but most would agree a “30 something” year old adult, dating 16 and 17 year olds, and we’ll use your word, is “creepy”, irregardless of whether its legal or not. And most likely deadly for a political career. Are you a member of the Latter Day Saints club.
>Thank you. Getting a good chuckle from your post as you continue in and attempt to label me, and yes, insult me. Not that I care, but most would agree a “30 something” year old adult, dating 16 and 17 year olds, and we’ll use your word, is “creepy”, irregardless of whether its legal or not. And most likely deadly for a political career. Are you a member of the Latter Day Saints club.
So why is it creepy? If you’d stop getting so triggered maybe we could have a discussion.
See my post 185 I just wrote. Which proves Moore is dissembling at best. It’s pure logic and test it on your own personal memory. What is disturbing is why Moore would lie at all, when the truth would have helped him. There was nothing illegal about chastely dating the 17 year old.
Re Sean, please note the amount of people Hannity reaches with conservative truths every day. He is an extremely hard worker for our side. He is very valuable. He has the energy of a team of oxen and he will actually risk his career for the truth. He doesn’t stop working if his paycheck is threatened, unlike the “super intellectual” talkers.
I revere hard work and balls more than I do lazy sneaky (Rush steals lines verbatim from FReepers to appear as smart as he does) brainiacs who think they are better than everyone else. Sean is a bulldog hockey player for our conservative team and he doesn’t get the he admiration he deserves here. His Everyman persona does reach many good people who are leading busy lives and just don’t understand the mainstream hold on their opinions until they learn the truth. Sean’s flaws, like the repetition, might be annoying for those in the know, but it helps him reach those whom we need to reach. Contrasted with his strengths, his flaws are so minuscule.
So why is it creepy? If you’d stop getting so triggered maybe we could have a discussion.
—
Boy were you raised right?
For my part, I probably went out with and mostly made out with half the eligible girls in my high school at one time or another.
Especially if you were in your thirties at the time and she was in high school.
>Boy were you raised right?
Sure was. The purpose of marriage is a good environment for children. In that regard marrying, 30 or 40-year-old women is completely counterproductive as fertility drops like a rock once a woman hits her late 20s.
We’ve been programmed by our creator to seek out sexually mature and fertile women. It’s a Puritan mentality to view marrying someone younger than oneself as immoral, not a biblical or practical view.
Of course, a neo-purtian would just toss insults instead of debating the issue. You may hate the label, but frankly, everything you do screams it.
So again, you want to debate the issue or are you just going to get trigged like a snowflake and toss insults?
"Minor" is a legal term. Under law, one leaves childhood and the age of minority, and enters adulthood and the age of majority. This age has varied widely, both historically and even regionally within the United States. Historically speaking, females marrying in their mid-teens has been the norm and thus the laws regarding age of consent, i.e. age of majority at which point one is legally capable of consenting, has been set in the mid-teens. The age of consent in Alabama right up to 2003 was 14. Therefore, a 14 year old was not a minor in Alabama in 1979. If you find it offensive that a 32 year old male went out with and possibly kissed a 14 year old female in 1979 Alabama, you're going to have to find some basis other than a legal one for that offense.
“Sean, please note the amount of people Hannity reaches with conservative truths every day. He is an extremely hard worker for our side.”
what side are you talking about? the establishment side? Wallbanger supports the smear, fresh from receiving his talking points from the establishment.
Mmmm. Not really. I’d like to say so and maybe I would think better of my adolescence and young adulthood. But, it wasn’t that way for me. My older sister told me when I was about 14 myself that if I took my overweight cousin to the junior high dance i would be seen as a pretty safe date by the insecure but more desirable girls.
She was right.
Did you know that some of the best girls at that age are totally insecure? They are scared to death to jump into the game in a big way. I made a career of them.
The 52 year old woman in question has a history of accusing men of faith of trying to molest her. They were against pastors and thrown out of court. In almost 40 years she never accused Roy Moore, until the Wa Post found out about her habit of accusing men of faith, and got her to “think real hard” and presto she remembered another one when from 40 years ago and he just happens to be running for the US senate.
So I am calibrated - what is your definition of “dated” for this discussion. Went to the burger or went to the bedroom?
Hannity sounds like an idiot ranting and raving about how despicable it is for a 32 year old man to date 17 or 18 year old women, Don’t know what universe he’s livin in. What are you trying to hide Hannity.
So again, you want to debate the issue or are you just going to get trigged like a snowflake and toss insults?
==
LOL, my friend. Do you even know what triggered means? I don’t think I’ve ever seen as many attempts at insulting me while at the same time being accused of insults. And yes 16 and 17 year olds are pretty darn close to being kids, they’re in the process of becoming adults, but not there yet. 30 something years olds pursuing them is, and we’ll use your word again, creepy. There are a few cultures and cults in the world that would disagree with this line of thinking, but not any with a shred of common sense of maybe decency. Take a time machine and go back 200 years you’ll find like minded folk. Adios.
Truly. I was in my teens in the 70’s. I generally went out with guys who were older because they were more mature. I definitely cannot remember what happened on a given day. After high school, I moved away. It was the 80’s. I do not remember everyone I dated. If someone came out and claimed I did x, y or z, well I doubt I would remember, maybe, but, like I said, it was the 80’s. It was a different world then.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.