Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Blunt warning to Rocket Man in advance of Trump visit to DMZ? Or perhaps recon ops in preparation for dropping a fat boy on fat boy?
1 posted on 11/03/2017 4:27:54 PM PDT by KingofZion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: KingofZion

Hehehehe, sending a message to Lil Kim.


2 posted on 11/03/2017 4:29:26 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

One of Trump’s biggest hindrances to taking action against North Korea, is the impact on South Korea.

Wouldn’t it be something if he ordered action while standing among the people of South Korea.


4 posted on 11/03/2017 4:34:16 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

I wonder what Rocket Man will try over the coming days while Trump is in the region. Interesting we now have three carrier groups in the area.


5 posted on 11/03/2017 4:34:27 PM PDT by Reno89519 (PRESIDENT TRUMP, KEEP YOUR PROMISES! NO AMNESTY AND BUILD THAT WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

I wonder what Rocket Man will try over the coming days while Trump is in the region. Interesting we now have three carrier groups in the area.


6 posted on 11/03/2017 4:34:27 PM PDT by Reno89519 (PRESIDENT TRUMP, KEEP YOUR PROMISES! NO AMNESTY AND BUILD THAT WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

Ha Ha, burning chickens in the barnyard!


7 posted on 11/03/2017 4:39:39 PM PDT by JPJones (Who is FOR tariffs? George Washington, Ronald Reagan and Me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

Radio all day, Fox Radio— kept saying the B1-B was not “a nuclear bomber”. It’s mission is not “nuclear strategic” anymore... however it is capable as friends have told me, of carrying W-61 and W-83-— supersonically. As well as other deliverables of a massive level (JDAM for example).

The context was the “norks” not getting it right- that B1-B is not nuclear.

Puzzle as to why they would do this, unless to loyally lull. US still has a non-first strike policy— so no need. But, were we to actually deliver, it could be done so fast they would have zero chance of reply. And all hell would break loose. Hence the need to talk to the new “Mao” in chinee land.


8 posted on 11/03/2017 4:44:49 PM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion
“In late September, B-1B bombers from Guam conducted a rare flyover north of the demilitarized zone that divides the Korean Peninsula.”

This kind-of makes it sound like US warplanes flew over North Korea. I don't think it happened that way.

Correct me if I'm wrong but I believe US planes stayed in international airspace, perhaps off the North Korean coast.

The Wall Street Journal should clear this up.

9 posted on 11/03/2017 4:52:28 PM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

Enough overflights. Let’s do it!


16 posted on 11/03/2017 5:58:47 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: KingofZion

There will be many flybys to lull them asleep.


17 posted on 11/03/2017 6:00:03 PM PDT by DaxtonBrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson