Raising the boy to be a good little rump ranger too. How disgusting.
I’ve heard that mohammadens love making cakes for homosexual faux weddings.
Form an artist consortium.
Those requesting pictures/art/food make their requests to a consortium host.
The host directs the request to the artist that the host feels most appropriate.
The requestor has NO choice in the matter.
They can take it or leave it.
You have the freedom to marry. You have no right to compel others to help you celebrate a wedding.
Compelled speech is not free speech and no one should be forced by the state to violate deeply held personal beliefs.
Is Obamunism still the law of the land???
What ever happened to “We reserve the right to refuse service to anyone”???
The government may permissibly regulate? Who is giving permission? The government of course. Recursive and tyrannical.
So much for freedom of association.
Guess some people’s right not to be offended outweighs the God given, Constitutional right NOT to associate or render your services to those you do not want to associate with.
What on earth has happened to Arizona?? Is there something in the water there causing them to go loco??
Raising the boy to be a good little rump ranger too. How disgusting.
If their lifestyle is so awesome and normal, why do they have to force people to participate in their delusion through the courts?
Outsource the work.
Fine. Nobody says they have to be right or done on time.
Nobody has a right to order an artist to produce artistic expression on demand on a subject he finds abhorrent. You think you could force Barbra Streisand to sing hymns of praise for Trump?
All this means is that Christians have no religious freedom in AZ and that, sooner or later, there will be a persecution.
Well, that violates the First Amendment.
The government has no business telling private businesses how to run and whom to serve.
That *judge* way overstepped his bounds.
Will this same judge force muzzie cab drivers to accept seeing eye dogs in their cabs? Or any dog pets? Muzzies say dogs are unclean and against their religion; also accepting people carrying alcohol or even drunks.
This is incredibly absurd, the notion that a judge can appoint himself as a higher authority and command obedience over the God of one’s beliefs. That’s really what this boils down to. I say obey the God you believe in, not this clown. You have freedom of religion. This judge is trying to force you to believe in him and HIS religion. He can’t do it.
Make the damned cake but make it ugly.
Ruling violates first amendment rights, etc
Wrong.