Bombshell: Longtime Clinton Friend Admits ‘Warning’ Top-Level Democrats About Weinstein

Big Hollywood (Breitbart) ^ | October 18, 2017 | John Nolte

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Linda Bloodworth-Thomason, the creator of the iconic 90s sitcom Designing Women and a close friend for decades of Bill and Hillary Clinton, admits that she not only knew of producer Harvey Weinstein’s predations, but that she warned “top-level” Democrats about him.

Buried deep within a Hollywood Reporter guest column, Bloodworth-Thomason drops this bombshell (with a deflecting shot at Fox News): “I confess to having had no problem warning at least three top-level Democratic operatives against allowing Harvey Weinstein to host political fundraisers. A warning that evidently (and to the glee of Fox News) fell on deaf ears.”

She also says she was a member of “a ‘Let’s Bring Harvey Weinstein Down’ lunch club” and appears to express some disbelief towards those who, “despite knowing him for decades,” now “announce they had no idea what was going on.”

To this, she writes, “OK. Whatever.”

If Bloodworth-Thomason knew about Weinstein’s alleged predations and warned top-level Democrats, how difficult is it to add two and two to come up with the Clintons and the Democrat Party knew?

Certainly, and we have no reason to doubt Bloodworth-Thomason, at least three top-level Democrats knew, and did nothing to stop Weinstein from becoming a major player and fundraiser within the Party.

Talk about a War on Women.

For the Clintons and the Democrat Party, Harvey Weinstein was a rainmaker. Over the years, he not only personally contributes somewhere around a million dollars to various Democrats, including the Clintons and President Obama, his bundling and fundraising raised, by some estimates, tens of millions of dollars.

[Fhios]

Gotta get on that bandwagon earlier dear. We’re at the tail end of that news cycle.

[Enchante]

She is a complete and total fraud as a supposed "feminist" defender of women:

However, I will be the first to admit that clearly delineated moral choices can still be painfully complex where friendship is involved. One of the best friends I will ever have and a man I love dearly, former President Bill Clinton, has certainly taxed my feminist conscience, but always without diminishing my affection. I even helped write his apology to the nation for his own sexual misconduct, was sitting next to him when he delivered it, and believe to this day it was based on something that was none of our business. And yes, some may call it hypocritical[.]

[odawg]

Hillary Clinton just said the other day that she had heard nothing of the gossip going around about Weinstein.

She probably had joined in on occasion.

[TigersEye]

What did she know and when did she know it?

[unixfox]

Such a mean woman.

[4Liberty]

Hey Linda,

[kearnyirish2]

I’m not really following this story, but only today am hearing the words “rape” and “assault”. If he did these things prosecute him; if he simply traded movie roles/acting careers for sexual favors then prosecute the “victims” as prostitutes and him as a john.

The insincerity of many of the “victims” reeks; if they had come forward at the time instead of dirtying themselves to further their careers they many have spared some genuine victims later.

[bitt]

http://bobagard.blogspot.com/2017/10/hillary-confidant-knew-of-weinsteins.html

here’s a fun link re: HRC

[bitt]

that is fabulous! I am stealing it!

[Yaelle]

She admired the slimy Bill Clinton, so that makes her a bandwagon phony now against Weinstein. But, Ha Ha Ha, last laugh is on Hillary. It’s tantamount to proof Hillary knew. Everyone knew. I knew. Everyone knew.

[adorno]

One sexual assaulter is not tolerable, and is ugly.

The other is a sexual assaulter, not so ugly, but tolerable. The biggest difference being that, the tolerable sexual predator got elected to the highest office in the world, therefore, “more likeable” for his power.

It’s not about being hypocritical at all. It’s about having a warped mind.

[Robert DeLong]

Of course she knew, and she could care less about the victims or the pervert and what he did. That is why she refuses to return monies he donated. Besides, not like she was not into perverted sex herself. Wouldn’t surprise me if she forced herself on women as well.

[who_would_fardels_bear]

What does she know about John Pederasta ... er ... Podesta?

[zeestephen]

Re: “We have no reason to doubt Bloodworth-Thomason.”

I don't believe her. Bloodworth-Thomason claims she warned “at least three top-level Democratic operatives.”

What are their names?

Bloodworth-Thomason claims “these kinds of atrocities against women routinely go unreported and unpunished in the entertainment industry.”

Again, no names.

Bloodworth-Thomason claims she was a member of “a ‘Let’s Bring Harvey Weinstein Down’ lunch club.”

Again, no names.

Bottom Line - Bloodworth-Thomason knew about Harvey Weinstein for decades, and did absolutely nothing to stop him.

[lizma2]

I don’t either....Travelgate.

She’s a Rat operative.

[Ann Archy]

She is VERY close to the Clintons!!! Hilliary NEVER knew....yeah RIGHT!!

[Impy]

Sure you did, Linda. Sure you did.