Skip to comments.
Did The Vegas Shooter Use A Fully Automatic Weapon?
hot air ^
| 10-2-17
Posted on 10/02/2017 8:58:36 AM PDT by doug from upland
Opinion is divided this morning on Twitter among people who, unlike me, know more than the most basic basics about firearms. Its not a matter of mere curiosity; as you (should) know, fully automatic weapons have been illegal in the U.S. for decades, which is why even mass shooters hellbent on murder unto death never use them. If Stephen Paddock used a machine gun, how on earth did he get it?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; lasvegas; lvmassacre; mandalaymassacre; massmurder; paddock; paddockweapons; stephenpaddock
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-259 next last
To: doug from upland
Charles C. W. Cooke ✔@charlescwcooke If true, big departure. Full auto costs $10,000+, requires deep FBI check; legal autos used 3 crimes since 34. (1) https://twitter.com/NatashaBertrand/status/914822207913721857
5:23 AM - Oct 2, 2017 157 157 Replies 1,189 1,189 Retweets 1,547 1,547 likes
2
posted on
10/02/2017 8:59:26 AM PDT
by
doug from upland
(Stand and honor the flag --- locking arms BS doesn't cut it)
To: doug from upland
Probably not, I mean...those things are illegal
/s
3
posted on
10/02/2017 8:59:33 AM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: doug from upland
From hearing the video, yes.
To: Dalberg-Acton
No way you could get off 400 rounds otherwise. Your finger would be ready to fall off halfway through that.
To: doug from upland
It sure sounded like an automatic was used on the videos that are being shown.
6
posted on
10/02/2017 9:01:42 AM PDT
by
TruthWillWin
(The problem wiath socialists is that you eventually run out of other peoples money.)
Slide fire stocks most likely....
7
posted on
10/02/2017 9:02:01 AM PDT
by
TnTnTn
To: doug from upland
... as you (should) know, fully automatic weapons have been illegal in the U.S. for decades...
Well, that's not true.
8
posted on
10/02/2017 9:02:07 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: doug from upland
The guy had money so it seems. It isn’t hard to convert semi into full automatic.
9
posted on
10/02/2017 9:02:17 AM PDT
by
eastforker
(All in, I'm all Trump,what you got!)
To: doug from upland
From the sound bytes I heard, it sounded like this maniac had high capacity drum mags.
10
posted on
10/02/2017 9:02:31 AM PDT
by
jimbug
To: doug from upland
Opinion is divided this morning on Twitter among people who, unlike me, know more than the most basic basics about firearms.
Among those that know more than those that know more than the most basic basics about firearms, opinions are not divided. It was a fully automatic gun.
I have to admit that if he injured over 500 and killed over 50, you would think the barrel would be a blob of molten steel, though.
11
posted on
10/02/2017 9:03:05 AM PDT
by
robroys woman
(So you're not confused, I'm male.)
To: BenLurkin
The sound from the video definitely indicates a rate of fire from a fully automatic rifle...... whether initially designed or modified, the end result in this case would be similar.....
12
posted on
10/02/2017 9:03:24 AM PDT
by
nevergore
(I have a terrible rash on my covfefe....)
To: Dalberg-Acton
>>From hearing the video, yes.<
tikatikatikatikatikatikatikatikatikatikatika
was what I heard. Had to be.
Get ready for the gun grabbers, who I am sure are jumping with glee at this tragedy.
13
posted on
10/02/2017 9:03:34 AM PDT
by
freedumb2003
(The UK has no death penalty, unless you are an 11 month old infant with no arrest history)
To: Sopater
What is the legal status of such guns?
14
posted on
10/02/2017 9:04:08 AM PDT
by
ifinnegan
(Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
To: Dalberg-Acton
15
posted on
10/02/2017 9:05:27 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: doug from upland
This presumes he would acquire a fully automatic weapon legally.
16
posted on
10/02/2017 9:06:17 AM PDT
by
ealgeone
To: doug from upland
My wife, and I am sure she is not alone, is asking this morning why automatic weapons are allowed ‘with all of these attacks’. Explained to her that I think this is the first US terrorist attack with an automatic weapon. Ban machine guns she suggests. And how do we carve that out and keep the 2nd amendment alive? Argument on both sides is that automatic weapons likely make up what, maybe 1% of all privately owned guns?
17
posted on
10/02/2017 9:06:29 AM PDT
by
Reno89519
(PRESIDENT TRUMP, KEEP YOUR PROMISES! NO AMNESTY AND BUILD THAT WALL.)
To: ifinnegan
18
posted on
10/02/2017 9:06:44 AM PDT
by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: robroys woman
I have to admit that if he injured over 500 and killed over 50, you would think the barrel would be a blob of molten steel, though.
>><<
He had more than one.
19
posted on
10/02/2017 9:06:50 AM PDT
by
laplata
(Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
To: jimbug
The amount of rounds does not matter in the discussion. It was fully automatic, whether original or modified is the only question of a salient post event investigation. My ear says they were 308 or 7.62 rounds, most likely 7.62.
20
posted on
10/02/2017 9:07:13 AM PDT
by
mazda77
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-259 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson