Posted on 09/29/2017 10:19:27 AM PDT by drewh
He was the kind of person American conservatism seeks to enable the self-made man; the radical, pajama-clad individual; the author of his own destiny. And he idealized women as women, in a way the left no longer allows.
Ironically, when given the choice of going full-throttle into hard-core pornography, and creating the kind of content the market now demanded, or bowing to mainstream traditional standards that shunned nudity on supermarket shelves, Playboy made the more conservative choice. Even in the battle to survive commercially, there were lines Hugh Hefner would not cross. He thus took his place alongside the very conservatives he once mocked earlier.
That does not mean Hefner was a conservative. But Hefner personified the famous promise at the heart of the Declaration of Independence that this Republic would be devoted to the pursuit of Happiness. He pursued that ideal in an age when the left insisted on grievance and misery. He lived an eccentric life. But in the end, he gave up the thrill of girlfriends for the love of one wife. He challenged social conventions, but he also, perhaps despite himself, affirmed the eternal truth that women are women, and there are moral limits.
Hefners victory came with a loss namely, the institution that was Playboy itself. Our culture now rejects the ideal of feminine beauty that Playboy once promoted, regarding it as a form of oppression rather than liberation.
But that feminine ideal lives on not in the pages of Playboy, but in the imaginations of millions of quietly dissenting adults in the world Hefner helped create. However he is judged, Hefner changed us all.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Fixed it.
Exactly. He was a termite devouring the foundation of our society. That others were worse termites does not excuse him.
He was America’s most innovative and preeminent pimp. Make no mistake. He was a neo pagan, epicurean hedonist who contributed mightily to the social rot of America.
“Why Conservatives Should Celebrate Hugh Hefner”
No. Just no.
Hefner normalized pornography, brought it out of the shadows.
The first slip on the slippery slope.
But he helped to create the environment where such a thing was seen as acceptable. The Judeo-Christian society which we had prior to this was as a result damaged by encouraging sleazy behavior.
Hefner opened the door of social acceptance, and both the girls and society would have been better off if that acceptance had remained unassailed.
Toward the end of his life, Hef was just plain creepy. Popping Viagra, a new 20 year old bimbo every couple months. His life-end was cheap, pathetic and hollow.
There were pinups and calendars in offices, garages, and barracks long before Hefner and Playboy came along.
And yes, with racier pics than this that can't be posted here.
Pre 1953 America wasn't nearly as innocent as you believe
No.
I see it is a difficult assignment to read the first sentence, so I will quote them exactly:
the self-made man; the radical, pajama-clad individual; the author of his own destiny.
Refute at least one in light of the title of the article "Why Conservatives Should Celebrate Hugh Hefner"
PS, don't allow continued hatred to blind you.
I wholeheartedly agree. He also debated with Buckley on Firing Line.
I wholeheartedly agree. He also debated with Buckley on Firing Line.
Hefner was a hedonist and a very shallow one at that in spite Playboy’s of
pretentious.
Amen. No problem with this angle. Hefner showed hot nekkid women. Men love hot nekkid women. What’s the problem?
Has anyone heard of Marquis de Sade. 200 years before Hef. Graphic porn existed long before Hef.
Absolutely. Before 1953 and Playboy people never had affairs outside marriage...
Now that I can agree with. His pretentiousness (And Playboy's) was insufferable.
bfl
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.