The Studly Dude had the hots for Granny ...
Posted on 09/11/2017 11:17:34 AM PDT by Zakeet
As if Hillary Clinton's new book couldn’t get any stranger, newly released audio reveals she thinks Russian president Vladimir Putin is a sexist "manspreader."
"When I sat with Putin in meetings, he looked more like one of those guys on the subway who imperiously spreads their legs wide," the former secretary of state says in "What Happened," "encroaching on everyone else's space as if to say, 'I take what I want.'"
"They call it 'manspreading,'" she asserts.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
The Studly Dude had the hots for Granny ...
OMG....
She is so jealous that when she spreads her legs, only her colostomy and urine bags are revealed. She has Putin Penis Envy. She probably has Convenient Murder Envy too... oh, wait, no, she doesn’t need that...
Because Hillary is programmed to think in such meaningless terms.
Please tell me she didn’t really write that in her book.
Can she be even more of a laughingstock than she is already? Is that even possible?
What do you see when Hillary spreads her legs?
Depends...
Yeah, he even took your e-mails.
Hillary is pathetically desperate. What a joke!
I’ve never seen a former presidential candidate behave so arrogantly.
Hey, Killary—you decrepit witch...better a “manspreader” than a demonic manure spreader like you.
GO AWAY Hillary... YOU LOST...
It’s over... Time to move on instead of being angry at the whole world.
All she does is blame everything and everyone but herself.
Weird....so when this man spreading business started I sat in a chair and attempted to sit quietly with legs closed. Ouch! The boys were dying. So with this scientific study I conclude that men are not physically built to sit with legs tightly closed....Where’s my grant?
She’s neurotic too.
Shrillary is trying to evoke every tired, trite Femtard theme.
Oh, is that what the “culture” of progressive poodle herders are calling their manufactured psychotic “perception” these days?
Fortunately for Putin, he’s beyond the purview of comrade Clinton’s PIP reports.
“PIP seems to have become a popular tool to the new generation middle managers for the purpose of a “homogeneous team”. That is, PIP has become an acceptable and common practice to get rid of the “black horse” employee that is typically high-skilled and highly productive, thus at odds with a team of mostly mediocre members (including the manager) and hard to terminate based on pure work performance.”
I’m starting to think that the editorial meetings at her publisher were full of laughter —
“Have you got to Chapter 6? Hoo boy! I can’t believe she put that stuff in there! She’s a complete loon! Publish it? Hell, yeah, we’ll publish it! The unbelievable crazy stuff is the only stuff that makes this thing readable!”
What is she going to accuse Putin of next? Raiding the girls’ tent she was in at the Communist Young Pioneers summer conference when she was 14? Short sheeting her bed? Pulling her hair? Dressing up as Bill on Halloween? Playing a girl’s position on the opposing high school field hockey team which cost her the Moscow city school championship?
I know, right? I just read about a journo murdered who was looking into Clinton-Putin dealings, and I had to wonder, which one put out the contract?
Why is it that leftist women packing a wide load whether sitting, standing or in a state of repose seem to be the most worried about this manufactured, politically motivated attempt at emasculation? Is it because they think they’re entitled to ooze over into everyone else’s space and resent the competition? Just marking territory like a dog cocking it’s leg on a tree, or what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.